Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society, 255 So. 2d 170.

23 citing documents.

Carlton Maxey v. Universal Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Maxey v. Universal Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Louisiana Bag Co., Inc. v. Audubon Indem. Co. 999 So. 2d 1104 La. 2008
Sanders v. Home Indem. Ins. Co. 594 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Gardiner v. Old Hickory Cas. Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Coker v. American Health & Life Insurance Co. 525 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
LeBlanc v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London 402 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Hebert v. Breaux 398 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Bank of Coushatta v. Thomas 378 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Berry v. Berry 371 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Carney v. American Fire & Indem. Co. 371 So. 2d 815 La. 1979
Paret v. Louisiana Health Ser. & Indem. 366 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1978); (La.App.
Sanders v. General Amer. Life Ins. Co. 364 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
3rd Cir. 1973); (La.App.
Casey v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 360 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
4th Cir. 1970); (La.App.
Woodard v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 350 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
the court in a case indistinguishable from the one here appealed, rejected the 100% penalty and attorneys' fees provisions of R.S.
Wigley v. Commercial Union Insurance 339 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Davis v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 329 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Cotlar v. Gulf Ins. Co. 318 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Broussard v. National American Life Insurance Co. 302 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Reichert v. Continental Insurance Company 290 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In this connection, we note Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society, La.App., , in which the insured sought penalties under Section 657.
Holloway v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 290 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Co., Cases in which courts have held that delays in payment of the full amount of the benefits provided by a policy beyond the prescribed period, and subjecting the company to penalties and attorney fees, (La.App.
Rushing v. American Income Insurance Company 274 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
As we said in Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society, La.App., : An insurer must take the risk of misinterpreting its policy provisions.
Heiman v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 270 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
the plaintiff sought to recover disability benefits under a group insurance policy.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by