Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., 49 So. 2d 852.

77 citing documents.

Cole v. Golemi 271 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc. 268 So. 2d 656 La. 1972
LeBlanc v. Argonaut Southwest Insurance 258 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1950); and Dandridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Company, 192 So.
Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc. 254 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
23:1032; , (1950); Meche v. Farmers Drier & Storage Company, (La.App.
Rowell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 243 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Gant v. Jackson Brewing Co., La.App., ; Kent v. Shell Oil Co., 5 Cir., 286 F.2d 746 .
Allen v. United States Fire Insurance Company 222 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
(1950); Best v. J & B Drilling Company, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1963); and Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, La.App., (Orl.
Beard v. Wilson Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 215 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., , affirmed , , the Courts said: "We find the following statement found in the case of Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., , (2), to be very appropriate and applicable to these three cases: `The compensation statute, with its amendments, was designated to cover all employees who might rea
Meche v. Farmers Drier & Storage Company 193 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Best v. J & B Drilling Co., La.App.
Hebert v. Blankenship 187 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
543 , ; Best v. J & B Drilling Co., La.App., 3 Cir., , cert.
Goodwin v. United States Rubber Company 186 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
This is in line with Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., ; , in which the Supreme Court upheld the previous decision of this Court in the same suit, and the case of Best v. J & B Drilling Company, La.App., .
James v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co. 175 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
380 , (1951); , (1950); Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation, 171 *451 La.
Best v. J & B DRILLING COMPANY 152 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
the Supreme Court had under consideration an interpretation of LSA-R.S.
Finn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 141 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
529 , ; , ; Mau v. Industrial Steel Products Company, La.App.2d Cir., 1960, ; O'Brien v. Columbian Carbon Company, La.App.
Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc. 136 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
23:1061; , ; Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co., 219 La.
Bordelon v. Great American Indemnity Company 124 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
23:1032, 23:1061; , ; Sisk v. L. W. Eaton, Inc., La.App.
Gant v. Jackson Brewing Company 112 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
901 , ; , ; Seabury v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corporation, 171 La.
Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 112 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
[5] See Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., 1950, , , wherein the Supreme Court quoted the principle enunciated in the Horrell case with approval.
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co. 110 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
887, 891 ; Thibodeaux v. Sun Oil Company, La.App., 765 , affirmed , ; Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co., 219 La.
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co. 95 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Sisk v. L. W. Eaton Co., La.App.
Holland v. Marquette Casualty Co. 95 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
380 , 53 * ; , ; Rooney v. Overseas Ry., 173 La.
Calcote v. Century Indemnity Company 93 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Stansbury v. Magnolia Petroleum Company 91 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
is strikingly similar to the present case.
Sisk v. L. W. Eaton Co. 89 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Coal Operators Cas. Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 66 So. 2d 852 La. 1953
wherein a compensation insurer of a subcontractor of the principal contractor was denied recovery against Sun Oil Company for the amount of compensation and medical expenses paid to Baker, an employee of the Houston Oil Field Company, subcontractor, an exception of no right or cause of action *80
Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co. 53 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
Sections 6, 7, and 34, Act 20 of 1914, as amended, LSA-RS 23:1061, 23:1101, 23:1032; Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Co. et al., La.App., , affirmed , .
Baker v. Sun Oil Co. 49 So. 2d 854 La. 1950
For the reasons assigned in the cases of Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Company et al., Baker v. Sun Oil Company et al., and Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service, Inc., , 49 So.Zd 85Z handed down this day the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service, Inc. 49 So. 2d 855 La. 1950
For the reasons assigned in the cases of Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Company ét al., Baker v. Sun Oil Company et al., and Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service, Inc., , 49 So.Zd 852, handed down this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by