Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prejean, 45 So. 2d 627.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
“The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” (1950).
State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
So.2d 627 (1950).” See also State v. Cloud, 06–877 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
iana Revised Statutes 14:81(A)(1) defines indecent behavior with a juvenile as “[a]ny lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons” which is committed “with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person[.]” (1950), the supreme court provided guidance in determining whether an act is a lewd or lascivious act: The word ‘lewd’ means l
State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
“The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried out in a wanton manner.” (1950).
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David J. Doyle La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh 236 So. 3d 1206 La. 2017
“The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” (1950).
State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(1950) provided guidance on how to determine what constitutes lewd arid lascivious activity: The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent) lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.
State v. Whitmore 58 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
4 See State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.02/13/04)
State of Louisiana v. Robert Bott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
the supreme court stated with regard to the definitions of “lewd” and “lascivious,” as it pertains to the offense of indecent behavior with a juvenile, that: The word “lewd” means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity o
State v. R.B. 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(1950), the supreme court stated with regard to the definitions of “lewd” and “lascivious,” as it pertains to the offense of indecent behavior with a juvenile, that: The word “lewd” means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or i
State v. RB 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
(1950), the supreme court stated with regard to the definitions of "lewd" and "lascivious," as it pertains to the offense of indecent behavior with a juvenile, that: The word "lewd" means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or i
State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
So.2d 627 (1950).” See also State v. Cloud, 06-877 (La.App.
State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(1950).” See also State v. Cloud, 06-877 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
So.2d 627 (1950).’ ” State v. Cloud, 06-877, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(1950).’” State v. Cloud, 06-877, p. 9 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Todd Andrew Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
So.2d 627 (1950); State v. Bugbee, [34,524 (La.App.
State v. Jones 32 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(1950); State v. Bugbee, [34,524 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Vidrine 9 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
(1950); State v. Bugbee, supra.
State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
(1950); State v. Bugbee, supra .
State of Louisiana v. Paul D. Massey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The supreme court in State v. Prejean (1950) provided guidance on how to determine what constitutes lewd and lascivious activity: The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.
State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
So.2d 627 (1950).” In this case, before touching her genitals with his hand and tongue, the Defendant rubbed his body against the minor, kissed her lips and put his tongue into her mouth.
State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In doing so, we stated: addressed the type of activity necessary to constitute lewd and lascivious activity: -8- The word ‘lewd’ means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexua
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In doing so, we stated: , addressed the type of activity necessary to constitute lewd and lascivious activity: The word `lewd' means lustful, indecent, lascivious, and signifies that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.
State v. Gaspard 841 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
App. 4th Cir.1991) ( , (1950).)
State v. Roberts 796 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Free 643 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Hillman 613 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Louviere 602 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
App. 4th Cir.1991) ( , (1950).)
State v. Rollins 581 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Holstead 354 So. 2d 493 La. 1977
-79 , -30 (1950), it was stated: The words "lewd" and "lascivious" found in the statute are not vague and indefinite.
State v. Terregano 336 So. 2d 859 La. 1976
(1950), in which we held a similar bill of information valid.
State v. Edwards 283 So. 2d 231 La. 1973
(1950); State v. Hebert, 205 La.
State v. Lewis 217 So. 2d 381 La. 1968
Also, we think that the issue passed on, , , although the case dealt with a different statute, is analogous to that now presented and that our decision therein is controlling of the one here.
State v. Di Vincenti 93 So. 2d 676 La. 1957
644 , ; State v.. Prejean, , ; and State v. Thompson, 228 La.
State v. Milford 73 So. 2d 778 La. 1954