Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Hutton v. City of Baton Rouge, 47 So. 2d 665.

25 citing documents.

Henry Consulting, LLC v. the New Orleans City Council La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
(1950); Russell v. Morrell, 11-1635, p. 2 (La.
Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club 919 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Harold Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
So.2d 665 (1950); State ex rel.
Hoag v. State 889 So. 2d 1019 La. 2004
Wilbert Rideau v. James R. Andrus, Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
So.2d 665 (1950); (La.App.
Rideau v. Andrus 868 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hebert v. Abbey Healthcare Group, Inc. 657 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
West Jefferson Levee District v. Mayronne 622 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Felix v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 477 So. 2d 676 La. 1985
Landry v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 421 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Schoenberger 378 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
DJ Talley & Son, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 303 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Firemen's Pension and Relief Fund v. Sudduth 276 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Caddo Parish School Board v. City of Shreveport 254 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
[1950]): “The writ of mandamus issues only when there is a clear and specific legal right to be enforced or a duty which ought to be and can be performed.
Summerell v. Phillips 247 So. 2d 542 La. 1971
this Court noted: “Furthermore, an appellate court of this state has held that a mandamus proceeding is not a proper proceeding * * * to attack the validity of a statute.” The case identified was State ex rel.
Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish School Bd. 243 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
(1950), that "the writ of mandamus issues only when there is a clear and specific legal right to be enforced or a duty which ought to be and can be performed," and that "this writ is never granted in doubtful cases."
State Ex Rel. Hayes v. Louisiana State Board of Barber Examiners 208 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Deville v. City of Oakdale 180 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Gautreau v. Board of Electrical Examiners 167 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Boyle v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 163 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
) and the only real difference between this contract and one let for the same work by public bidding is that the Canal Street improvement will be accomplished at no cost to the City.
State Ex Rel. Summit Fidelity and Surety Company v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish 131 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Cook v. City of Shreveport, 163 La.
State v. Southwestern Electric Power Co. 127 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
in which a privilege or license is distinguished from a franchise.
State ex rel. Stephens v. Kees 110 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Hutton v. City of Baton Rouge, 1950, , .
City of New Orleans v. Belas 106 So. 2d 291 La. 1958
City of Baton Rouge v. Hutton 49 So. 2d 613 La. 1950
in which this defendant sought to compel the city, by a writ of mandamus, to grant him a certificate of convenience and necessity under the very ordinance the legality o-r constitutionality of which he is presently attacking.