39788
Precedential
Processed
State v. Dowdy
State v. Dowdy, 47 So. 2d 496 (La. 1950).
Cited by
- State v. Miller 964 So. 2d 911 La. 2007
- State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
- State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
- State v. Walker 394 So. 2d 1181 La. 1981
- State v. Crumholt 357 So. 2d 526 La. 1978
- State v. Sutfield 354 So. 2d 1334 La. 1978
- State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
- State v. Hodgeson 305 So. 2d 421 La. 1974
- State v. Clark 305 So. 2d 457 La. 1974
- State v. Triplett 285 So. 2d 532 La. 1973
- State v. Sinclair 245 So. 2d 365 La. 1971
Opinion text
McCALEB, J., concurring. I am in agreement with all of the rulings in this case but not with the obiter dictum that an accused charged with a capital offense is required to request that counsel be •assigned to him for his defense. It is my view that the proviso contained in Article 143 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ■contemplates that, if the accused in a capital case has not employed counsel, it becomes the mandatory duty of the court to “assign counsel for his defense of at least five (5) years’ actual experience at the bar.”