39788 Precedential Processed

State v. Dowdy

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 29, 1950 · 47 So. 2d 496

Cited by

Opinion text

McCALEB, J., concurring. I am in agreement with all of the rulings in this case but not with the obiter dictum that an accused charged with a capital offense is required to request that counsel be •assigned to him for his defense. It is my view that the proviso contained in Article 143 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ■contemplates that, if the accused in a capital case has not employed counsel, it becomes the mandatory duty of the court to “assign counsel for his defense of at least five (5) years’ actual experience at the bar.”