Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dowdy, 47 So. 2d 496.

36 citing documents.

State v. Miller 964 So. 2d 911 La. 2007
State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
1981), State v. Sutfield, supra , , (1950), prior sex crimes committed against the same prosecutrix, State v. Acliese, 403 * and cases cited therein, and evidence of criminal acts of the accused constituting admissions by conduct intended to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the present crime, State v. Burnet
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Additional exceptions established by Louisiana courts include other crimes evidence introduced to show motive, [2] , , (1950) [3] , and prior sex crimes committed against the same prosecutrix admitted to show a lustful disposition toward that victim
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
Other jurisprudentially recognized exceptions include other crimes evidence introduced to show motive, State v. *488 Lafleur, State v. Sutfield, supra , , (1950), prior sex crimes committed against the same prosecutrix, and cases cited therein, and evidence of criminal acts of the accused constituting admissions by conduct intended to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the present crime, State v. Burnette an
State v. Walker 394 So. 2d 1181 La. 1981
State v. Crumholt 357 So. 2d 526 La. 1978
In accord with general authority, See, McCormick § 190, Louisiana courts also have admitted such evidence for purposes other than those listed in the statutes, e. g., identity, motive, , (1950); evidence of criminal acts of the accused, constituting admissions by conduct, intended to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the present crime, (Docket No. 60,053).
State v. Sutfield 354 So. 2d 1334 La. 1978
*1337 1973); motive, , (1950); evidence of criminal acts of the accused, constituting admissions by conduct, intended to obstruct justice or avoid punishment for the present crime, (Docket # 60,053).
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
State v. Hodgeson 305 So. 2d 421 La. 1974
State v. Clark 305 So. 2d 457 La. 1974
State v. Triplett 285 So. 2d 532 La. 1973
State v. Sinclair 245 So. 2d 365 La. 1971
State v. Washington 236 So. 2d 23 La. 1970
State v. Washington 236 So. 2d 23 La. 1970
State v. Alexander 211 So. 2d 650 La. 1968
51 , 1 L.Ed.2d 53 ; , ; State v. Carter, 217 La.
State v. Brown 202 So. 2d 274 La. 1967
State v. Hopper 203 So. 2d 222 La. 1967
State v. Reese 194 So. 2d 729 La. 1967
In later cases, all explaining and distinguishing this ruling, involving photographs, this court consistently adhered to the general rule, pointing out that the Morgan case is regarded as “a case of most unusual circumstances.” See, , ; State v. Ross, 217 La.
State v. Whisenant 175 So. 2d 293 La. 1965
365 , , , , State v. Swails, 226 La.
State v. Carite 155 So. 2d 21 La. 1963
None of the cases cited are precisely in point, but they generally support the proposition applicable to this case, , (1950) as follows: “The general rule is that instructions of the court at the proper time nullifies the prejudicial effect of an improper statement made by a prosecuting officer during the course of the trial.
State v. Fulghum 138 So. 2d 569 La. 1962
“ * * * It occurs to us that the shackling or handcuffing of a prisoner who is to be charged with the serious crime of murder is an ordinary and customary procedure and counsel have not referred us to any decision by any court in which such an act would be considered as the use of force, threat, or intimidation which would invalidate an incriminatory statement made by a prisoner.” , .
State v. Minor 129 So. 2d 10 La. 1961
212 , ; , ; State v. Jourdain, 225 La.
State v. Newton 128 So. 2d 651 La. 1961
212 , ; , ; State v. Jourdain, 225 La.
State v. Yaun 110 So. 2d 573 La. 1959
assigned by the trial judge on March 26, 1958 (the date of the rendition and signing of the judgment appealed from), the written reasons for judgment, signed April 7, 1958 and filed in the record on that date, comes too late; that this court cannot consider any “per curiaros” of the district judge which may have been filed after the appeal, had been taken on April 3, 1958, , .
State v. Melerine 109 So. 2d 471 La. 1959
certiorari denied 340 U.S. 856 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Melerine 109 So. 2d 471 La. 1959
certiorari denied 340 U.S. 856 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Jenkins 107 So. 2d 632 La. 1958
14:14 “if the circumstances indicate that because of a mental disease or mental defect the offender was incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong with reference to the conduct in question, the offender shall be exempt from criminal responsibility.” , , we held that “a plea of insanity at the time of the commission of the crime involves a fact affecting the guilt or the innocence of the accused and necessarily it must be tried on the merits and submitted to the jury the same as all othe
State v. Smith 99 So. 2d 8 La. 1958
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
588 ; , , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 856 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 92 So. 2d 569 La. 1957
State v. Compagno 89 So. 2d 158 La. 1956
State v. Brossette 86 So. 2d 87 La. 1956
918 , ; , , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 856 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Jackson 80 So. 2d 105 La. 1955
588 ; , , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 856 , 71 S.Ct.
State v. Brazile 75 So. 2d 856 La. 1954
Motions for assignment of separate counsel were filed by both defendants before arraignment, , .
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952