Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 63 So. 2d 11.

28 citing documents.

  • Hogan v. Hogan 549 So. 2d 267 La. 1989
    862 , (1954); , Snow v. Snow, 188 La.
  • Clooney v. Clooney 446 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • McManus v. McManus 428 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Hendershot v. Hendershot 407 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    862 , (1954); , (1953); (La.App.
  • Lachney v. Lachney 399 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    In Hebert , relying on the earlier cases of Pisciotto v. Crucia, supra, , (1953) we denied the father credit for unpaid child support during a period when he was vested with custody by the juvenile court stating: "We agree with the trial court that it is extremely inequitable to hold the husband liable for child support under the alimony decree for the nearly three months duri
  • Seifert v. Seifert 374 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Bruner v. Bruner 373 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Thompson v. Courville 372 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Vernon v. Leger 363 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Wisdom v. Wisdom 356 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Siepman v. Hotz 346 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    862 , (1954); , (1953); (La.App.
  • Whitt v. Vauthier 316 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Grishman v. Grishman 322 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • McConnell v. Theriot 295 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    862 , ; , and other cases cited therein.
  • Vinson v. Vinson 292 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
  • Simon v. Calvert 289 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Duplechan v. Duplechan 270 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    862 , ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
  • Caldwell v. Gilbert 253 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    the Supreme Court stated: "The jurisprudence is that where once there has been an award of alimony it remains in full force and effect until the aggrieved party applies to the court and is granted a modification thereof.
  • Tiffee v. Tiffee 212 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    374 , (1952); , (1953); (La.App.
  • Coleman v. Coleman 209 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    The jurisprudence is, , 63 So.
  • Granger v. Granger 193 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • Hebert v. Hebert 159 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    862 , ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
  • Bush v. Bush 144 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Moreau v. Moreau 142 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    151 , ; , ; Pepiton v. Pepiton, 222 La.
  • Knight v. Knight 130 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    784 , ; , ; Kieffer v. Heriard, 221 La.
  • Drouin v. Hildenbrand 105 So. 2d 532 La. 1958
    151 , ; , ; Pepiton v. Pepiton, 222 La.
  • Boatner v. Boatner 102 So. 2d 472 La. 1958
    151 , ; , ; Pepiton v. Pepiton, 222 La.
  • Cannon v. Cannon 74 So. 2d 147 La. 1954