Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Honeycutt, 49 So. 2d 610.

28 citing documents.

State v. Callihan 242 So. 2d 521 La. 1970
117 , ; , , and cases there cited.
State v. Ash 242 So. 2d 535 La. 1970
18 , ; , ; State v. Dartez, 222 La.
State v. Flanagan 222 So. 2d 872 La. 1969
713 , ; , ; State v. Roy, 217 La.
State v. Rockeymore 216 So. 2d 828 La. 1968
483 , ; , ; State v. Bennett, 235 La.
State v. Singleton 204 So. 2d 293 La. 1967
796, ; , ; State v. Roy, 217 La.
State v. Moye 194 So. 2d 717 La. 1967
15:498 et seq.; , , and authorities cited; State v. LeBleu, 203 La.
State v. Brent 184 So. 2d 14 La. 1966
State v. Sanford 181 So. 2d 50 La. 1965
78 , ; , ; State v. Kopf, 223 La.
State v. Brown 180 So. 2d 410 La. 1965
So.2d 618; , ; State v. Lecompte, 214 La.
State v. Scott 172 So. 2d 69 La. 1965
796 , ; , ; State v. Roy, 217 La.
State v. Wilson 171 So. 2d 664 La. 1965
337 , ; , ; State v. Bellam, 225 La.
State v. Cloud 166 So. 2d 263 La. 1964
State v. Graves 165 So. 2d 285 La. 1964
15:498 et seq.; , (1950).
State v. Robinson 157 So. 2d 461 La. 1963
and cases cited therein.
State v. Robinson 151 So. 2d 371 La. 1963
796 , ; , ; State v. Roy, 217 La.
State v. Green 150 So. 2d 571 La. 1963
State v. LeBleu, 203 La.
State v. Forsythe 144 So. 2d 536 La. 1962
State v. Gaines, 223 La.
State v. Kelly 131 So. 2d 43 La. 1961
337 , , and authorities therein cited; State v. Honeycutt, 1950, , ; State v. Brown, 1959, 236 La.
State v. Brown 108 So. 2d 233 La. 1959
“ , , that it is well settled in the jurisprudence of this court that in a criminal case, even though the testimony may be taken, transcribed, and placed in the transcript, it cannot be considered by us and has no proper place in the record unless it is annexed to, and made a part of, a bill of exception ti
State v. Pitcher 106 So. 2d 695 La. 1958
1036 , ; , ; State v. Lorello, 222 La.
State v. Brazile 99 So. 2d 62 La. 1958
198 , ; , , and the numerous authorities cited therein; State v. Weber, 221 La.
State v. Richard 89 So. 2d 367 La. 1956
18 , ; , ; State v. Dartez, 222 La.
State v. Peltier 86 So. 2d 693 La. 1956
‡ % :jc “ , , that it is well settled in the jurisprudence of this court that in a criminal case, even though the testimony may be taken, transcribed, and placed in the transcript, it cannot be considered by us and has no proper place in the record unless it is annexed to, and made a part of, a bill of exception ti
State v. Ware 84 So. 2d 56 La. 1955
18 , ; , ; State v. Dartez, 222 La.
State v. Harrell 82 So. 2d 701 La. 1955
State v. Gaines 66 So. 2d 618 La. 1953
We said in State v. Honeycutt, 218 La, 362, , that it is well settled in the jurisprudence of this court that in a criminal case, even though the testimony may be taken, transcribed, and placed in the transcript, it cannot be considered by us and has no proper place in the record unless it is annexed to, and made a part of, a bill of exception timely perfected.
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
The testimony taken during the trial is in the record, but, since it is not attached to, or made a part of, the bills of exception, , , in which this court said: “ * * * we cannot consider the matters urged by counsel for defendant on this appeal.
State v. Jones 57 So. 2d 689 La. 1952