Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board, 57 So. 2d 197.

22 citing documents.

Covey Park Gas, LLC v. Bull Run Acquisitions II, LLC and Beaver River Resources La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Voelkel v. Harrison 572 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
15 (1933); , (1952); Canterberry v. Slade Brothers, 232 La.
Martin Fuel Dist., Inc. v. Trans Gulf Fuel, Inc. 496 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Watterson v. Magee 498 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
100, 105 (La.1909); , (1952); (La.App.
Dowden v. Security Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
(1952); Estate of Boyett v. L.L.
Judice-Henry-May Agency, Inc. v. Franklin 376 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
100 (1909); , (1952); Redmann, The Louisiana Law of Recordation: Some Principles and Some Problems, 39 Tul.L.R.
Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. 363 So. 2d 506 La. 1978
Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 355 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
2 Cir. 1951); , (1952); (La.App.
Succession of Leopold Welsch v. Carmadelle 264 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
4th Cir. 1962); , (1952).
Bagby v. Clause 251 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
The application of the legal principles and precepts enunciated in Quatre Parish Company, , (1952), and other cases hereafter cited of similar import, to the facts of the instant litigation will now be confronted.
Estate of Boyett v. L. L. Brewton Lumber Co. 223 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1952), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that damage to young timber resulting from a negligent cutting by a defendant who was held to be in legal bad faith, was too speculative to permit recovery.
Foster v. Beard 221 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
633 , (1952); , (1952); Coastal Transmission Corporation v. Lejeune, supra; Dendinger Inc. in Liq.
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Knapp 156 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
15 ; Daigle v. Calcasieu National Bank in Lake Charles, supra; , ; Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Company, 235 La.
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Woodcock 150 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
100 , , , dismissed the interventions on the ground that the descriptions contained in the previously recorded mortgage and warranty deed were not sufficient to place plaintiff on notice that those documents were intended to affect the attached property.
Coastal Transmission Corporation v. Lejeune 148 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Hargrove v. Hodge, 2 Cir., 9 La.App.
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
899 , ; , ; Gayle v. Slicer, 188 La.
Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of Highways 103 So. 2d 74 La. 1958
Dendinger Inc. in Liquidation v. Thompson & Thompson Forest Products 94 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Cobbs v. Jackson 85 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Also cited was Fluker Farms v. James, La.App., , , .
Fluker Farms, Inc. v. James 79 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
199 , our Supreme Court through Justice McCaleb dealt with a case that involved alleged illegal cutting and removal of timber from property allegedly belonging to the plaintiff.
Smith v. Taylor 75 So. 2d 850 La. 1954
2d 609 .” In a most recent case, , , the suit of Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board, this Court held that a description of property as being in Range 9, whereas, it was in Range 8, was improper and a third person could not be charged with knowledge of the error.