Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hill v. Richey, 59 So. 2d 434.

124 citing documents.

Leo Cumpton and Sarah B. Bolton v. Dragon Estates, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Huey P. Robinson and Ruthie M. Robinson v. Faith Land Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Andermann v. Rouillier 271 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Hill v. Richey , , (1952) ; Boneno , 589 So.2d at 595 .
Franks Inv. Co. v. Shaw 268 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
7/1/94), ; Hill v. Richey , , (1952) ; Brunson v. Hemler, supra.
Crooks v. Department Of Natural Resources 263 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Inc. v. Landry , , 244 (La.1990) (quoting Hill v. Richey , , 421, , 440 (1952) ), the supreme court explained the meaning of enclosures as follows: "What the court means by 'enclosures', as that term is used in the numerous cases found in the jurisprudence, is that the land actually, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be established with c
Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
( (1952)), the supreme court explained the meaning of enclosures as follows: “What the court means by ‘enclosures’, as that term is used in the numerous cases found in the jurisprudence, is that the land actually, physically, and corporeally
Harley Mitchem v. Lester Soileau and Jeanelle Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Mitchem v. Soileau 222 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Marlon Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
.” So.2d 434, 440 (La.1952).
Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC 178 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
fix with certainty the boundaries or limits thereof_”
Kadair v. Hampton 146 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3rd Cir.1965); , (1952); Broussard v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, (La.App.
Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Dubois 57 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
y, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be established with certainty, whether by natural or by artificial marks; that is, that they must be sufficient to give definite notice to the public and all the world of the character and extent of the possession, to identify fully the property possessed, and to fix with ^certainty the boundaries or limits thereof....”
Brunson v. Hemler 989 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
3rd Cir.4/6/94), , writ denied, 94-1198 (La.7/1/94), ; , (1952).
Baker Printing Company, Inc. v. Kimball Properties, LLC 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
(1952) (evidence of use of adjoining strip of land for grazing and logging purposes established possession of such land: the limits, character, and extent of which were fixed with sufficient certainty by fences, remains of old fences, marks on trees and no trespassing signs to entitle possessor to maint
Teresa Allen v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Allen v. Belgard 925 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Ryan v. Lee 870 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
of 1870) and revision comments; see also *1142 Liner, supra; , 59 So.
Secret Cove, LLC v. Thomas 862 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3rd Cir.4/6/94), -550 , writ denied, 94-1198 (La.7/1/94), ; , (1952).
Gewalt v. Stevens 757 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3rd Cir.4/6/94), -550 , writ denied, 94-1198 (La.7/1/94), ; , (1952).
Conway v. Crowell Land & Mineral Corp. 635 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Boneno v. Lasseigne 589 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
ctually, physically, and corporeally possessed by one as owner must be established with certainty, where by natural or by artificial marks; that is, that they must be sufficient to give definite notice to the public and all the world of the character and extent of the possession, to identify fully the property possessed, and to fix with certainty the boundaries or limits thereof.” , (1952).
McDaniel v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. 560 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
(1952); General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Williams, Inc., (La.App.
Chevron USA Inc. v. Landry 558 So. 2d 242 La. 1990
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.
Clifton v. Liner 552 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Art. 3426 (1982), comment (d), , (1952)."
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Landry 546 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Patin v. Dow Chemical Co. 546 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cuthbertson v. Unopened Succession of Tate 544 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Amis v. Miller 524 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
articles 3499-3505; Hill v. Richey, et al., , (La.App.
Boise Southern Co. v. Stanfield 509 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(1952), affirmed, 225 La.
Rogers v. Haughton Timber Co., Inc. 503 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Armstrong v. Armstrong 493 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
For there to be adverse possession it is essential that it be open, notorious and the bounds be clearly marked, giving notice of the character and the extent of possession Liner [supra]; Hill v. Richey , (1952).
Merchant v. Acadia-Vermilion Irrigation Co. 476 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Succession of Burat v. Board of Levee Com'rs 469 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Art. 3426 (1982), comment (d), , (1952).
O'Quinn v. Haas Inv. Co., Inc. 458 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Romar v. Estate of Gay 454 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
[at 441] (1952)" The requisite possession to entitle one to bring the possessory action is identical to the possession which is required to commence the running of acquisitive prescription.
Oliver v. Kennington 458 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Chaney v. State Mineral Bd. 444 So. 2d 105 La. 1983
Mire v. Crowe 439 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Bossier v. Shell Oil Co. 430 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Harvey v. Harvey 431 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Whitley v. Texaco, Inc. 434 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Chaney v. State Mineral Board 428 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hawthorne v. Succession of Hawthorne 419 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, , (1952).
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc. 412 So. 2d 975 La. 1982
Alvarez v. Hub City Iron Works, Inc. 405 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
articles 3499-3505; Hill v. Richey, et al., , (La.App.
Seven Water Holes Corp. v. Spires 393 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Garrett v. Martin Timber Co., Inc. 391 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Cheramie v. Cheramie 391 So. 2d 1126 La. 1980
Although fences or walls were an early jurisprudential requirement to show possession, , (1952), we recognized that the necessity of a fence or wall is not justified or supported by the Civil Code.
Finley v. Hailey 389 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
*832 William T. Burton Industries, Inc. v. Cook, supra.
Allbritton v. Powell 389 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hill v. Richey, et al., , ; Broussard v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, et al., La.App.