Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Waldo v. Morrison, 58 So. 2d 210.

21 citing documents.

  • Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 1962); So.2d 210 (1952).
  • Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Costello v. Hardy 864 So. 2d 129 La. 2004
    (1952) (quoting Gosserand v. Gumbel, 154 La.
  • Lincecum v. AdServe, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Freeman v. Cooper 414 So. 2d 355 La. 1982
  • Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    (1952); Bienvenu v. Angelle, 254 La.
  • Union Service & Maintenance Co. v. Powell 393 So. 2d 94 La. 1980
  • Freeman v. Cooper 390 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    [8] , ; Sabine Tram Co. v. Jurgens, 143 La.
  • Adserv Corp. v. Lincecum 385 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1952); Lescale v. Schwartz, 118 La.
  • Harrison v. Uniroyal, Inc. 366 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Waldo v. Morrison * * * [ , (1952)]."
  • Lees v. Smith 363 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    3 Cir. 1971), writ refused, 1971; , (1952).
  • Calvert v. Simon 311 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    872 (1918); , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 ; (La.App.
  • Viera v. Kwik Home Services, Inc. 266 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    [3] , (1952); 50 Am.Jur.2d, Libel and Slander, § 231 (1970); 32 A.L.R.2d 418 .
  • Foster v. McClain 251 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    (1952); Bienvenu v. Angelle, 254 La.
  • Jones v. Davis 233 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
    797, 799 ; , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 .
  • Russo v. Kelly 228 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The basis for defendants’ , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 (1952).
  • Cormier v. Blake 198 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    852 (1923); , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 (1952).
  • Miller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press 142 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    32 A.L.R.2d 419 , reaffirmed the general principles laid down in the Kennedy case.
  • Giordano v. Tullier 139 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    852 , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 .
  • Sunseri v. Shapiro 138 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Oakes v. Alexander, La.App., ; , , 32 A.L.R.2d 419 ; Lescale v. Joseph Schwartz Co., 116 La.
  • Oakes v. Alexander 135 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Finally on this issue, in deference to counsel's zealous development thereof, we have considered the authorities cited in brief and find it necessary to comment only with respect to counsel's observation that the Supreme Court of Louisiana had noted "* * * `the common-law rule of absolute privilege' which has been adopted by the Federal Court.", , , 32 A.L. R.2d 419.