DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 73 So. 2d 781.

103 citing documents.

  • John Mantiply and Melissa Sue Mantiply v. Joseph I. Hoffman, Jr., M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    Co., So.2d 781 (1953), overruled on other grounds, ).
  • Mantiply v. Hoffman 263 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Co. , , (1953), overruled on other grounds , ).
  • Netherland v. Ethicon, Inc. 813 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Co., , (1953) (A physician is required "to exercise the degree of skill ordinarily employed, under similar circumstances, by the members of his profession in good standing [with] reasonable care and diligence....").
  • Romero v. Bellina 798 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Williams v. Golden 699 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1954) and its progeny (which pre-date the Medical Malpractice Act), which stated the locality rule and declared the following is applicable to the standard of care: "[I]t is `incumbent on the physician, surgeon or dentist who becomes defendant in a malpractice case to show that he is possessed of the r
  • Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp. 643 So. 2d 1236 La. 1994
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., (La.
  • Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 636 So. 2d 211 La. 1994
    Co., , (1953) (A physician is required "to exercise the degree of skill ordinarily employed, under similar circumstances, by the members of his profession in good standing [with] reasonable care and diligence....").
  • Carter v. Louisiana State University 520 So. 2d 383 La. 1988
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953), a medical malpractice case, involved oral surgery in which a tooth was knocked loose by a laryngoscope and projected into the plaintiff's right lung where it was immediately removed by a bronchoscope.
  • Hunt v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 522 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1953)
  • Mariano v. Tanner 497 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, (La.
  • Seals v. Pittman 499 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954).
  • Sam v. XYZ Insurance Co. 484 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954), stating that a general physician has a duty to exercise the degree of care ordinarily employed, under similar circumstances, by the members of his profession in good standing in the same community or locality.
  • Matthews v. La. State Univ. Medical Center 467 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953); (La.App.
  • Harwell v. Pittman 428 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (La.
  • Belmon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 427 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., Butler v. Louisiana State Board of Education, supra; Harris v. State, through Huey P. Long Memorial Hospital, supra.
  • Harris v. State, Through Huey P. Long Hospital 371 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954); Uter v. Bone and Joint Clinic, 249 La.
  • Andrews v. C. F. & I. Steel Corp. 369 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., [La.
  • Holloway v. Southern Baptist Hospital 367 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Co., 1954, , , "and its doctrine as to the inapplicability of res ipsa loquitur to most malpractice cases".
  • Delaneuville v. Bullard 361 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, , Uter v. Bone & Joint Clinic, 249 La.
  • White v. Edison 361 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1953).
  • Borne v. Brumfield 363 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Hines v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 361 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Paul, Minn., et al, , which established the “locality rule” in medical malpractice cases.
  • Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 360 So. 2d 1331 La. 1978
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Fairchild v. Brian 354 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1954).
  • Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 350 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • McAdams v. Holden 349 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Percle v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 349 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953); McCann v. Baton *1302 Rouge General Hospital, (La.
  • Megason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 355 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Sugulas v. St. Paul Insurance Co. 347 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953) as follows: “A physician, surgeon or dentist according to the jurisprudence of this Court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Chatellier v. Ochsner Foundation Hospital 348 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Adams v. Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital 346 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1953) as follows: “A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Stracener v. Brown 345 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1954).
  • Perrin v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Pettis v. State Department of Hospitals 336 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Paul, Minn., et al, , (1953), as follows: "A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Parker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 335 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury *732 Indemnity Co., , (1953): "A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Butler v. Louisiana State Board of Education 331 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953), is: "A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Guilbeau v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 325 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1954) as setting forth the rule which controls the determination of questions of negligence on the part of surgeons: "As a general rule it is his duty to exercise the degree of skill ordinarily employed, under similar circumstances, by the members of his profession in good standing in the same communit
  • Coppage v. Gamble 324 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953); Uter v. Bone and Joint Clinic, 249 La.
  • Bruno v. Clements 326 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (S.Ct.1953): "[1] A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
  • Lemoine v. Bunkie General Hospital 326 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954).
  • Daigle v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 323 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Couto v. Oms 319 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Paul Mercury Underwriters Company, , (1954)], should have been a clear indication to the trial judge that its applicability can not be disregarded without a clear instruction to the jury.
  • Delaune v. Davis 316 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953).
  • Chappetta v. Ciaravella 311 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1953) is the prevailing law and since the practices and procedures employed in Roark v. Peters, 2 La.App.
  • Green v. State, Southwest Louisiana Charity Hosp. 309 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., *710 , (1954); Uter v. Bone and Joint Clinic, 249 La.
  • Bell v. Faris 304 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Paul— Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954) at page 782.
  • Glenn v. Kerlin 305 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954), and Uter v. Bone and Joint Clinic, 249 La.
  • Wiley v. Travelers Insurance Company 300 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , at 786 (1954).
  • Pope v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company 299 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, , (1953) our Supreme Court defined the responsibility of a physician treating a patient.
  • Alleman v. Seventh Ward General Hospital 295 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., , (1954) sets out the rule applicable to the care that must be exercised by physicians, surgeons, or dentists, in the following terms: "A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of ski