Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Telford v. New York Life Insurance Company, 80 So. 2d 711.

15 citing documents.

Sevier v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. 497 So. 2d 1380 La. 1986
was, rather, an effort to reserve the right at trial on the merits to seek to recover more than the $89,569.59 if supportable, for "`the claimant is not conclusively bound [by the statements and declarations in the proof of loss] and may explain or contradict such declarations and statements, unless the facts are such as to create an estoppel against him.'" , (1955) (quoting 45 C.J.S.
Tiner v. Aetna Life Insurance Company 291 So. 2d 774 La. 1974
(1955); Harris v. Guaranty Life Insurance Co., 226 La.
Tingle v. Reserve Life Insurance Company 260 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Carlisle v. Washington National Insurance Co. 250 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Co., , ; Oliver v. Penn.
Adam Miguez Funeral Home, Inc. v. FIRST NAT. L. INS. CO. 234 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
The insurer is estopped to urge a defense based on errors or misstatements in the application made by its agent, , (1955); Miller v. Preferred Life Insurance Company, La.App., .
Knight v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co. 205 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co., , ; Bankson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 208 La.
Roy v. Trans-World Life Insurance Co. 199 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co., , ; Olivier v. Penn.
Stugest v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 170 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Fruge v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance Society 170 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Co., , ; Olivier v. Penn.
Chaffin v. Wabash Life Insurance 166 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Co., , and Miller v. Preferred Life Ins.
Olivier v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance 146 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Co., , and Miller v. Preferred Life Ins.
Gleason v. Bankers Life & Casualty Company 147 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
37 ; , (1955), and cases therein cited.
Kennison v. US LETTER CARRIERS'MUTUAL BEN. ASS'N 132 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Co., , ; Bankson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 208 La.
Miller v. Preferred Life Insurance 107 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
713: “The jurisprudence of this State and the law generally prevailing is that if an application for insurance is drawn by an agent of the insurer, who fills in false answers to the interrogatories contained therein, which are truthfully answered by the insured, where the latter acted in good faith an
Matthews v. National Life & Accident Insurance 88 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Co., , , and the cases cited therein.