Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wier v. Grubb, 82 So. 2d 1.
- Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 63 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
-
Goodrich v. Exxon Co., USA
608 So. 2d 1019
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1955); Middleton v. California Co., 237 La.
-
Frey v. Amoco Production Co.
603 So. 2d 166
La. 1992
1908, 1967, 2669; Wier v. Grubb, 228 La 254, 268, (1955) (oil and gas leases require mutuality of rights and interest).
-
Crupe v. Huval Bakery, Inc.
544 So. 2d 119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
390 (1926); , (1955); Moossy v. Huckabay Hospital, Inc.
-
RG Claitor's Realty v. Juban
391 So. 2d 394
La. 1980
Moosy v. Huckaby Hosp., Inc., , (1955); State v. New Orleans Parkway Comm'n, 215 La.
- Ponthieux v. Lindsay 216 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Crow v. Southern Natural Gas Company 210 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
- Fontenot v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company 197 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
McDonald v. Grande Corporation
148 So. 2d 441
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
1015 , ; , ; Carter v. Arkansas La.
-
Odom v. Union Producing Company
129 So. 2d 530
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Nunley v. Shell Oil Company, 229 La.
-
Bailey v. Meadows
130 So. 2d 501
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
349 , ; Wier v. Grubb, 1955, , .
-
Lelong v. Richardson
126 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
The failure of compliance upon which plaintiff predicates his demand for cancellation, in the final analysis, rests upon the alleged failure of lessees to adequately develop the leased property under the provisions of the lease agreement, , .
-
Peart v. State
125 So. 2d 673
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
74 ; Wier v. Grubb, 1955, , ; Dowden v. State, La.App.1955, ; Boddie v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury, La.App.1956, .
-
Schnitt v. Woods
125 So. 2d 451
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Carter v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co., 213 La.
-
Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co.
121 So. 2d 344
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
846, 849 , ; Wier v. Grubb, 1955, , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 1954, 226 La.
-
Rushing v. Griffin
121 So. 2d 229
La. 1960
349 , , $1,000; , , $3,000; Wilcox v. Shell Oil Co., 226 La.
-
Breaux v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
121 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
656 , ; Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co., 8 Cir., 140 F. 801 ; , ; Prince v. Standard Oil Co., 147 La.
-
Evans v. Evans
117 So. 2d 73
La. 1960
1005 , ; , , and authorities there cited.
- Calvert Fire Insurance v. Delahoussaye 116 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Millers 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
- Sohio Petroleum Company v. Miller 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
- Middleton v. California Company 112 So. 2d 704 La. 1959
-
Texas Company v. Cooper
107 So. 2d 676
La. 1958
syllabus 8; cf., Berniard v. Galiano, 224 La.
- Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
-
Leaderbrand v. Shallow Oil Co.
101 So. 2d 673
La. 1958
Nunley v. Shell Oil Company, 229 La.
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Walker 98 So. 2d 153 La. 1957
-
Melancon v. Texas Company
89 So. 2d 135
La. 1956
790 , ; , ; and Nunley v. Shell Oil Co., 229 La.
- Viator v. Haynesville Mercantile Company 88 So. 2d 1 La. 1956
-
Nunley v. Shell Oil Company
86 So. 2d 62
La. 1956
handed down after the writs were granted in the present case, the sublessor sought the cancellation of a lease and two assignments thereunder on the ground of forfeiture resulting from the defendant's failure to sufficiently and diligently develop the land; this Court ordered the cancellation of the sub