Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Corkern, 91 So. 2d 569.

33 citing documents.

Nancy Estrada v. Shawn Peter Hulin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Cadlerock Joint Ventures Co. v. J. Graves Scaffolding Co. 152 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
It argued that a pledgee need not have actual possession of the collateral mortgage and *1082 note to interrupt prescription; “it is sufficient that it be in [the possession of] someone who holds for the account of the creditor,” , (1956).
Gulf National, L.L.C. v. Alfortish, Inc. 926 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(1956), Succession of Picard, 234 La.
Elizabeth W. Naquin v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See La.Civ.Code art. 3165; So.2d 569 (1956).
BELLSOUTH TELE. v. City of Lafayette 919 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See La.Civ.Code art. 3165; , (1956).
SECURITY NAT. PART. LTD. PARTNER. v. Baxley 859 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Sanson Four Rentals, LLC v. Faulk 803 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
(1956); Alco Collections, Inc. v. Poirier, 95-2582 (La.App.
McGill v. Thigpen 780 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
455 , (1959); , (1956); (La.App.
GULF COAST BANK & TRUST v. Donnaud's Inc. 759 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Dupuis v. Faulk 609 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1956); Shell Western E & P v. Fluid Driers, Inc., writ denied
Cadle Co. v. Dumesnil 610 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Red Simpson, Inc. v. Lewis 583 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1956), for the proposition that the jurisprudence permits a third party, including the debtor, to hold an instrument as agent for the creditor.
Shell Western E & P v. Fluid Driers 572 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
McNamara v. George Engine Co. 519 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
4th Cir. 1973), writ denied , (1957).
Saunders v. Howell Petroleum Corp. 499 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Fontenot v. Hanover Insurance Co. 465 So. 2d 678 La. 1985
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. CONSOL. TERMINAL WAREHOUSE, INC. 460 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Agrico Chemical Co. v. EK Painting, Inc. 432 So. 2d 253 La. 1983
First National Bank of Commerce v. Hibernia National Bank in New Orleans 427 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(1956), where the court, in recognizing that there is a difference between a pledge and an assignment, held that a vesting of title in the transferee is essential to an assignment.
Mingledorff v. American Bank and Trust Co. 420 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Lambert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 403 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
667 , ; , and other cases cited by plaintiffs indicate that "[i]t is essential to the validity of an assignment of a right or claim to a third person that the transferor deliver a title to the transferee."
American Bank & Trust Co. v. Louisiana Sav. Ass'n 386 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Kaplan v. University Lake Corp. 381 So. 2d 385 La. 1980
Peoples Bank & Trust Co., Natchitoches v. Harper 370 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
(1956), our Supreme Court said the following: "The contracts of pledge and assignment are entirely different and produce varied legal results.
Kaplan v. University Lake Corp. 369 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
First Guaranty Bank v. Alford 366 So. 2d 1299 La. 1978
See Durham v. First Guaranty Bank, supra; , (1956).
Central Bank v. Bishop 353 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
(1956) a pledged insurance policy was found in the safety deposit box of the deceased pledgor.
Cush v. Hailey 344 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Plaintiff contends the tolling of prescription is interrupted by the pledge even though the possession of the thing pledged does not remain in the possession of the pledgee, , (1956).
First National Bank of Shreveport v. Querbes 253 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
1250 , , both Supreme Court decisions holding that possession of the instrument pledged is not absolutely essential to the validity of the pledge and the thing pledged may be held by a third party acting in the capacity of a trustee.
Powers v. MOTORS SECURITIES COMPANY 168 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
In the course of the opinion, wherein it was decided there was a complete lack of proof either of the object pledged, or that there had been delivery to or possession by the pledgee, , (1956) and had this to say: "In that case the Court found that there was possession by "an agent pro hac vice."
Wood v. Baker 141 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Kreppein v. Demarest 120 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
This has been held in innumerable decisions, , 91 So.
Succession of Picard 115 So. 2d 817 La. 1959
and numerous authorities cited therein.