Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stevens v. Johnson, 87 So. 2d 743.

20 citing documents.

ST. JUDE MEDICAL v. City Glass & Mirror, Inc. 619 So. 2d 529 La. 1993
Joe, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., , (1956).
GI Joe, Inc. v. CHEVRON USA, INC. PIPELINE DIV. 561 So. 2d 62 La. 1990
Succession of Skye 417 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
(1956) (per curiam on application for rehearing); Ritsch Alluvial Land Co. v. Adema, 211 La.
Pierce v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ETC. 392 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
851 , (1958); , (1956); Tatum v. Andrews, 165 La.
Lambert v. Donald G. Lambert Const. Co. 370 So. 2d 1254 La. 1979
(1956) (per curiam on application for rehearing); Ritsch Alluvial Land Co. v. Adema, 211 La.
Daigre v. Cochrane 287 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
(1956); Cortinas v. Murray, 224 La.
Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
(1956) Nelson Burk was the owner of the property in 1936.
Gebbia v. City of New Orleans 187 So. 2d 423 La. 1966
a wife brought suit to be declared the owner of certain property, and the defendants filed in the appellate court an exception of no cause or right of action based on the ground that she, a married woman, could not sue for the community.
Jefferson v. Jefferson 145 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
the plaintiff was a married woman seeking to be declared the owner of a certain tract of land.
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
2 Cir., , remanded on other grounds , ; Harris v. Natalbany Lumber Co., 119 La.
Van Horn v. Vining 133 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Annual Mississippi Conference of the Methodist Protestant Church v. First Methodist Protestant Church 121 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
A very excellent discussion of the aspects of the exception of want of capacity is given in Tulane Law Review, Volume 11, Page 538, , .
State ex rel. Albritton v. Moore 116 So. 2d 502 La. 1959
See Code of Practice Articles 345, 346, 902; , ; Mitchell v. First National Life Insurance Company, 231 La.
Clark v. Town of Mandeville 105 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
(on application for rehearing).
Metoyer v. Sewerage & Water Board 100 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
(on application for rehearing).
Thompson v. Walker 104 So. 2d 721 La. 1958
Short & Murrell v. Department of Highways 98 So. 2d 170 La. 1957
we drew a distinction between the exception of want of capacity and of no right of action.
Taylor v. Dunn 97 So. 2d 415 La. 1957
Mitchell v. First National Life Insurance 91 So. 2d 788 La. 1956
is pertinent here: *549 “It is clear that the dilatory exception of want of capacity is not involved here, as the exception of want of capacity puts at issue only the procedural capacity of the plaintiff, and does not raise the question of whether the plaintiff has any interest in enforcing judic