Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hodgeson v. McDaniel, 96 So. 2d 481.

28 citing documents.

Sonnier v. Conner 998 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
100 (1909); , (1957); (La.App.
Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
Head v. Bradley & Braud, Inc., (Tate, J., dissenting from denial of writs); , (1957); Bishop v. Copeland, 222 La.
Frazier v. Frazier 499 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
321 (1939); , (1957); Brewster Development Co., (La.App.
Headrick v. Lee 471 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
(1957); Alba v. Smith, 228 La.
Boase v. Edmonson 471 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
(1957); Alba v. Smith, 228 La.
Dunham v. Nixon 371 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1957); Alba v. Smith, 228 La.
Dufour v. Wood 346 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
We first note that, unlike Hodgeson v. McDaniel, 1957, , , this is not a case of a third party’s rights being involved.
Wood v. Morvant 321 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Givens v. Givens 273 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
(1957); Alba v. Smith, 228 La.
Southeastern Public Service Co. v. Barras 246 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
207 , ; , ; Banks v. Yarborough, La.App., .
White v. White 233 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
343 , ; , .” We concur in these findings by the trial judge and further cite Civil Code Article 248 which conferred upon Mrs. White the relation of tutrix by nature of her children.
Gaudet v. Lawes 197 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Plaintiffs rely on and cite the cases of Hodgeson v. McDaniel (1957) , , and British American Oil Producing Co. v. Grizzaffi (1962) La.App., .
Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Naquin 167 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
207 , ; , , Banks v. Yarborough, La.App., .
Fitch v. Broussard 156 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
with extensive citation of authority, "that property sold to one coowner or co-heir for delinquent taxes is regarded, so far as his coowners are concerned, as merely a payment of the taxes for all and any one or more of them may be reinvested with title by making claim on the tax purchasing coown
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Knapp 156 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
207 , ; , ; Banks v. Yarborough, La.App., .
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Woodcock 150 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
McDuffie v. Walker, supra; Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board, supra; , ; Strange v. Robinson, La.App.
Succession of Caldwell 147 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-484 , wherein it was stated: “It is the established jurisprudence that property sold to one coowner or coheir for delinquent taxes is regarded, so far as his coowners are concerned, as merely a payment of the taxes for all and any one or more of them may be reinvested with title by making claim on
Burt v. Valois 144 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
225 ; , , and King v. Bickham, La.App., .
Speights v. Nance 142 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
(1957), wherein the court had under consideration the right of third purchasers without notice and held that even where such third persons had personal knowledge of the defect in their title, that when dealing with immovable property they need look only to the public records.
Thompson v. Bradley 142 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
App., ; , , and Atlantic Refining Co. v. Golson, La.App., .
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
207 , ; , , Banks v. Yarborough, La.App., .
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Thus, where a co-owner buys property at a tax sale and lives on the property, the other co-owners lose their right to have their title restored by paying their proportionate share of the taxes to the purchasing co-owner whenever the rights of third parties have intervened, , .
White v. Lockhart 129 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Thus, where a co-owner buys property at a tax sale and lives on the property, the other co-owners lose their right to have their title restored by paying their proportionate share of the taxes to the purchasing co-owner whenever the rights of third parties have intervened, , 96 So.
Welsh v. Lagasse 128 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
Jones v. Jones 121 So. 2d 734 La. 1960
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
343 , ; Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. [La.App.], ; , 96 So.
King v. Bickham 105 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
at page 484, wherein the Supreme Court held: “ * * * Ever since the landmark decision of McDuffie v. Walker, 125 La.