Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Bailey, 95 So. 2d 326.

14 citing documents.

Rachal v. Stacy 480 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1957); Delpit v. Delpit, 232 La.
Simon v. Knipmeyer 417 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
179 , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, , .
Cage v. McCraine 239 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
179 , ; , ; Alice v. Woods, La.App., and Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, La.App., , both handed down by us on December 5, 1960, and not yet reported.” Obviously the position of the appellees is that the alleged brief filed by appellants (although filed before time for argument of the case
Modern Appliance & Supply, Inc. v. Sapp 200 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Delpit v. Delpit, 232 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Caldwell Bros. Real Estate, Inc. 169 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
It is well settled iri the jurisprudence that in these circumstances an appellate court may affirm such judgment under the presumption that the judgments of the district courts are correct.’ “See, also: “ , .
Bader Finance Co. v. Asset 169 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La.
State, Department of Highways v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 168 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
It is well settled in the jurisprudence that in these circumstances an appellate court may affirm such judgment under the presumption that the judgments of the district courts are correct.” See, also: , .
Garrison v. Kuntz 166 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of tire lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.App., ; Alice v. Woods, La.App., ; , ; Delpit v. Delpit, 232 La.
Chapman v. Lalumia 154 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
179 , ; , ; Alice v. Woods [La.App.], ; Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.App., [776]; F. A. B. Distributing Company v. Marullo, La.App., .” On the record before us it is manifestly impossible for appellant to point out any error.
Dorsey v. Corrugated Asbestos Contractors, Inc. 147 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
179 , ; , ; ; Rex Finance Company v. Morehead, La.App., ; F. A. B. Distributing Company v. Marullo, La.App., .
F. A. B. Distributing Co. v. Marullo 138 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Dia-Log Company v. Pareti, La.App., ; Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, La.App., ; Alice v. Woods, La.App., ; , ; Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La.
Dia-Log Co. v. Pareti 126 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
179 , ; , ; Alice v. Woods, La.App., and Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, La.App., , both handed down by us on December 5, 1960, and not yet reported.
Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead 124 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
179 , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, , .
Alice v. Woods 124 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
179 , ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, , .