Simon v. Knipmeyer
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 9, 1976 327 So. 2d 427; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 27, 1979 380 So. 2d 104
Simon v. Knipmeyer, 417 So. 2d 399 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Delpit v. Delpit 232 La. 539
- Perkins v. Buchler 223 La. 179
- Succession of Bailey 232 La. 824
- Nagim v. Morrison 95 So. 2d 326
Opinion text
BYRNES, Judge. The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument. He did show up later during that day, but he has not filed any briefs in connection with this case. The appellee has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed. Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Delpit v. Delpit, 1957, 232 La. 539 , 94 So.2d 660 ; Perkins et al. v. Buchler et al., 1953, 223 La. 179 , 65 So.2d 130 ; Succession of Bailey, 1957, 232 La. 824 , 95 So.2d 326 . We have examined the record carefully and find no error patent on the face thereof. *400 For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs. AFFIRMED.