DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pena, 988 So. 2d 841.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Keith Gilmore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Cortez Joseph La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    App. 2 Cir. 7/30/08), the appellate court considered whether an officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle based on, among other things, improper display of a license plate.
  • State of Louisiana v. Emily R. Fields La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Rickey L. Grant La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Lee 255 So. 3d 590 La. 2018
    App. 2 Cir. 7/30/08), ; see also United States v. Henry , 853 F.3d 754 , 757 (5th Cir. 2017) ("Given Pena , Freeman and Trosclair's belief that Section 32:53(A)(3) prohibited an obscured registration sticker was objectively reasonable").
  • State v. Bell 222 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Manning 196 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.07/30/08), .
  • State v. Prince 195 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.07/30/08), .
  • State v. Fuller 130 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), ; State v. Griffin, 41,946 (La.App.2d Cir.5/2/07), .
  • State v. Evans 130 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    App.2d Cir 7/30/08), ; State v. Young, 39,546 .
  • State v. Williams 112 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ; State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), ; State v. Sims, 40,300 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), .
  • State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    The standard for evaluating a challenge to a routine warrantless stop for violating traffic laws is the two-step formulation articulated in Terry v. Ohio, supra; State v. Lee, supra; State v. Khalfani, supra; State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), .
  • State v. Lee 79 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Khalfani, 43,647 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/08), , writ denied, 09-0267 (La.11/6/09), ; State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), .
  • State v. Fortune 72 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1568 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.07/30/08), .
  • State v. Birgans 57 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Evaluation of traffic stops involves the two-step formulation articulated in Terry v. Ohio, supra; State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), .
  • State v. Malone 56 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), ; State v. Sims, 40,300 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), .
  • State v. Lawrence 32 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    The standard for evaluating a challenge to a routine warrantless stop for violating traffic laws is the two-step formulation articulated in Terry v. Ohio, supra; State v. Pena, 43,321 (La.App.2d Cir.7/30/08), ; State v. Sims, 40,300 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), .
  • State v. Sera 997 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008