Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 93 So. 2d 13.
-
State of Louisiana v. Sterling Terrel Brown
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
221, 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957); So.2d 13 (1957); recalled in part, appeal after remand writ denied (1990).
-
State v. Allen
682 So. 2d 713
La. 1996
(1957), rev'd on other grounds, (La.
-
State v. Stacy
665 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957); , (1957); recall in part, appeal after remand writ denied, (1990).
-
State v. Van Winkle
658 So. 2d 198
La. 1995
221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957); , (1957); recalled in part, appeal after remand (La.
- State v. Whitmore 353 So. 2d 1286 La. 1977
-
State v. Jones
345 So. 2d 1157
La. 1977
(1957); State v. Vail, 153 La.
-
Overruled
State v. Lee
346 So. 2d 682
La. 1977
(1957) and State v. Holmes, 224 La.
- State v. O'BLANC 346 So. 2d 686 La. 1977
-
State v. Kinchen
342 So. 2d 174
La. 1977
State v. Bolen, La., (1976); , (1957).
- State v. Bolen 338 So. 2d 97 La. 1976
- State v. Sneed 328 So. 2d 126 La. 1976
-
State v. Anderson
259 So. 2d 310
La. 1972
345 , ; , , and at the time of the opening statement, the State was not cognizant of what the trial judge’s ruling would be with respect to the admissibility of the lineup testimony.
-
State v. Himel
257 So. 2d 670
La. 1972
Some of our later cases have held that the purpose of the opening statement is to inform and enlighten the jury, , (1957); State v. White, 244 La.
- State v. Dugas 211 So. 2d 285 La. 1968
- State v. Ragsdale 187 So. 2d 427 La. 1966
- State v. Jones 98 So. 2d 185 La. 1957