DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 97 So. 2d 389.

110 citing documents.

  • Green v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 325 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Co., , (S.Ct.1957) sets out the burden of proof necessary for plaintiff, in such cases as this, to recover.
  • Garrison v. Hotel Dieu 319 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • Gregory v. Guarisco 320 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. OF CONN. v. Garrick 312 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In Boudreaux, above, the court, in considering application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, stated the following: " , (1957): `* * * the maxim (res ipsa loquitur) means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of negligence, *106 not that they compel such an inference....
  • Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 309 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Co., , , it was said that the doctrine of res ipsa applies when the circumstances of an accident are such as to justify the inference that the accident was due to the negligence of the one having control of the thing which caused the injury and that this inference is drawn from the circumstances of the acciden
  • Chevis v. Farm Bureau Insurance 303 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1957): “It is generally conceded that res ipsa lo-quitur in no way modifies the rule that negligence will not be presumed.
  • Pear v. Labiche's Inc. 301 So. 2d 336 La. 1974
    In our opinion this is a , (1957).
  • Taylor v. CNA Insurance Group 300 So. 2d 479 La. 1974
  • Milton v. State (Health & Soc. & Rehab. Serv. Admin.) 293 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Ray v. Superior Iron Works and Supply Co., Inc. 284 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1957), remarkably similar to the instant case.
  • Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. United States F. & G. Co. 276 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • McCann v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 276 So. 2d 259 La. 1973
    Co., , (1957); Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
  • Ehrhard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 274 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Sharon v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. 270 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    the Supreme Court pointed out that res ipsa loquitur does not *905 modify the rule that negligence is never presumed, and neither does it dispense plaintiff from the burden of establishing negligence.
  • Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company 264 So. 2d 621 La. 1972
    Co., , (1957); Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • McCann v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 258 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brown 256 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1957); Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 245 La.
  • Sharrett v. Fontcuberta 246 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Co., , (1957) discussed the doctrine in these terms: “A determination of a proper instance for application of the principle of res ipsa loquitur has been the subject of volumes of discussion by learned jurists and legal scholars, who have been at pains to point out that the maxim means only that the facts
  • Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co. 245 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    145 , (1948) ; , (1957) ; Jones v. Shell Petroleum Corporation, 185 La.
  • Robinson v. Muller 242 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    In support of their plea, , (1957) for the proposition that the doctrine should be liberally applied.
  • Thomas v. Gillette Company 230 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
  • Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
  • Boudreaux v. First National Life Insurance Co. 225 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    Co., , (1957) remarkably similar to the instant case.
  • Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Lavergne 224 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    3d Cir. 1964); , (1957); Morales v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., 202 La.
  • Hanchey v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 218 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    3d Cir. 1964); *402 , (1957); Morales v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., 202 La.
  • King v. King 217 So. 2d 395 La. 1968
    Co., , ; Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
  • Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company 208 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    In the Pilie case, , (1957) the following often quoted statement of general principles of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur: "It is generally conceded that res ipsa loquitur in no way modifies the rule that negligence will not be presumed.
  • Montgomery v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc. 205 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Valentine v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 205 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., , ; Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, Inc., 237 La.
  • Wiley v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 205 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., , (1957); Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, 245 La.
  • West v. Hydro-Test, Inc. 196 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Minton v. Continental Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Brechtel v. Gulf States Elevator Corporation 195 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    * * * * * * "* * * Since such factor outside the control of the defendant could also have caused the present accident, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply, , 97 So.
  • Fruge v. Trahan 194 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Co., , ; Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 245 La.
  • D'Allesandro v. Edgar Murray 185 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; Bauer v. Columbia Casualty Company, La.App., .
  • Veillon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 182 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Co., , ; Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • Tarbox v. Eason 179 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Co., , ; Morales v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., supra; Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., supra.” The inference or presumption arising from the happening of an accident does not attach to one who is not shown to have been in control of the operation which produced the injury.
  • Gauthier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 179 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Co., , ; Malone, Res Ipsa Loquitur and Proof by Inference, 4 La.L.Rev.
  • James v. Childs, Division of Kroger Company 166 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
  • Daigle v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. 165 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Co., , , the Supreme Court held the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to be insufficient to prove negligence on the part of a driver of a vehicle which had crossed the road and overturned in a canal killing a passenger.
  • Nelson v. Zurich Insurance 165 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Turner v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 161 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Young v. Rand 159 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 158 So. 2d 162 La. 1963
    Co., , (1957), a case involving a collision between two private automobiles, the plaintiff sought to invoke the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
  • Miller v. Otis Elevator Co. 154 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Since such factor outside the control of the defendant could also have caused the present accident, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply, , .
  • Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 148 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co., , wherein Chief Justice Four-net of the Supreme Court of Louisiana thoroughly reviewed the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
  • Bougon v. Traders & General Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Co., , ; Singleton v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, La.App., 131 So.
  • Scott v. Many Motor Co. 140 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co., , (1957): “All that is meant by res ipsa loquitur is ‘that the circumstances involved in or connected with an accident are of such an unusual character as to justify, in the absence of other evidence bearing on the subject, the inference that the accident was due to the negligence of the one having contro
  • Singleton v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation 131 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Co., , , with adequate citation of authority, related the practical effect of the doctrine.
  • Hardey v. Sims 126 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Co., 1957, , , 391 as: “ * * * All that is meant by res ipsa loquitur is ‘that the circumstances involved in or connected with an accident are of such an unusual character as to justify, in the absence of other evidence bearing on the subject, the inference that the accident was due to the negligence of the one havi
  • Bauer v. Columbia Casualty Company 126 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Co., , ; Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., supra; Morales v. Employers' Liability Assur.