Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 97 So. 2d 389.

110 citing documents.

Distinguished Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 124 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Thomas v. Buquet & Le Blanc, Inc. 119 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Co., 1957, , , at pages 391, 392, Chief Justice Fournet remarked: “ * * * All that is meant by res ipsa loquitur is ‘that the circumstances involved in or connected with an accident are of such an unusual character as to justify, in the absence of other evidence bearing on the subject, the inference that the acciden
Derouen v. American Employers Insurance 118 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
54 [544], , and we quote: “A determination of a proper instance for application of the principle of res ipsa loquitur has been the subject of volumes of discussion by learned jurists and legal scholars, who have been at pains to point out that the maxim means only that the facts of the occurrence warrant the inference of n
Day v. National-US Radiator Corporation 117 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
and reiterated in Minton v. Continental Insurance Company, La.App., , recently decided by this court, the issue of determination of a proper instance for application of the rule of res ipsa loquitur has been the source of much judicial discussion but it is generally agreed that the princ
Shields v. United Gas Pipe Line Company 110 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Co., , ; Morales v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., supra; Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., supra.
Minton v. Continental Insurance Company 110 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
755 , , Ardoin v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Texas, La.App., , , all of which have held the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur inapplicable to factual situations similar to the circumstances herein involved.
Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 107 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Therefore, under the undisputed facts in this case, the DiBenedetto car came suddenly across Winbourne Avenue and into the lane of travel of Lobell, and while this did not make applicable the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur ( , ), it does under our well settled jurisprudence raise the presumption that DiBenedetto was negligent in the operation of the 1947 Chevrolet automobile.
Lee v. Moellenkamp 106 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Early v. Ethyl Employees Recreation Ass'n 101 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Furthermore, , , the Supreme Court stated as follows: “All that is meant by res ipsa loqui-tur is ‘that the circumstances involved in or connected with an accident are of such an unusual character as to justify, in the absence of other evidence bearing on the subject, the inference that the accident was due to th
Lebo v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance 99 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Co., La., , at footnote 6 on page 392.