Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cain v. Employers Casualty Company, 110 So. 2d 108.
- Musson Patout Automotive Group v. Jimmy Maynard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- Mary Ortega v. Cantu Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Bonnie Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Valerie Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Fabacher v. Stine, Inc. 124 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Lester Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Racca v. Acme Truck Lines, Inc. 115 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Gary Pickett v. J. B. Tuck Land Clearing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Pickett v. J.B. Tuck Land Clearing 157 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Anthony Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility 116 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Magbee v. Federal Express 105 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Paul Magbee v. Federal Express La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Monceaux v. Tosco Marketing Co. 801 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc.
773 So. 2d 694
La. 2000
23:1201 E , [108] and its progeny establish that an attorney is not entitled to collect a statutory fee from a claimant in addition to attorney's fees that have been awarded in conjunction with penalties, to be paid directly by the employer, I agree that the writ should be denied.
- Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Hawthorne v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
562 So. 2d 473
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
which holds that attorney's fees awarded as a penalty belong to the attorney and not the employee.
-
Prentice Oil and Gas Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT
421 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1959); Thigpen v. Thigpen, 231 La.
-
Cook v. Ed Francis Chevrolet, Inc.
365 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
206 , (1956); , (1959); (La.App.
-
State Dept. of Highways v. Terrebonne
349 So. 2d 936
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1959); Thigpen v. Thigpen, 231 La.
- Wactor v. Gurtler Hebert Const. Co. 343 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
-
Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling
321 So. 2d 17
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Herman v. Jambois, supra; , (1959); Thigpen v. Thigpen, 231 La.
-
Robichaux v. Robichaux
289 So. 2d 837
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
es rendered and the abuse of discretion by the district court in its awards affords no grounds for relief: In fixing attorney’s fees in quantum mer-uit where the legal services were rendered under the eye of the court, the trial judge is fully able to determine the value of the services without the necessity of hearing testimony by attorneys relative to that value: , ; Thigpen v. Thigpen, 231 La.
-
Lynch v. Burglass
286 So. 2d 170
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
[3] , ; Cabral v. Heitkamp, supra ; Schiro v. Perkins, La.App., ; Herman v. Jambois, La.App., .
- Trahan v. Rockwood Insurance Company 284 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- Dobbins v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 280 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Co.
252 So. 2d 511
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
22:658), the court in the Redding case held at page 885: “ , , the penalty attorney fee is fixed and determined ‘upon the basis of the attorney’s skill and the amount of work performed by him in the prosecution and collection of the total claim’.
-
Cannizzaro v. Great American Insurance
223 So. 2d 704
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In fixing the attorney’s fee, , , that the fee is to be based on the attorney’s time, skill and effort in representing his client.
- Roberie v. Ashy Construction Company 215 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
-
Harmon v. Mid-South General Contractors, Inc.
218 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In determining the amount of attorney’s fees, this court in the case of Cain v. Employers Casualty Company, La.App., (2d Cir., 1957), affirmed , (1959), held that the fee should be based on the skill of the attorney and the amount of work involved, and is in lieu of the statutory fee provided under the law.
-
Herman v. Jambois
205 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Thigpen v. Thigpen, 231 La.
-
Giddings v. Coal Operators Casualty Co.
205 So. 2d 189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
see also, Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
-
Delafosse v. Industrial Painters, Inc.
199 So. 2d 559
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
See, e. g.: , ($2,000); Plaisance v. Collins Industries, Inc., La.App.
-
Stroud v. Tremont Lumber Company
193 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
2d Cir. 1957 (writ granted); Id., , (1959); , La.App., 3d Cir. 1963.
-
Gallagher v. Gallagher
190 So. 2d 916
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
(1959); Hunt v. Hill, 138 La.
-
McClelland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
180 So. 2d 19
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
3rd Cir., 1963, writs denied), ; Redding v. Cade, supra; Cain v. Employers Casualty Co. (1959), , .
-
Funderburk v. Southwestern Iron Corp.
180 So. 2d 4
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
(1959); Monk v. Louisiana Forestry Commission, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1960).
-
Mitchell v. Connecticut Indemnity Company
161 So. 2d 460
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
wherein the Supreme Court clearly indicated the sole limitation upon the amount of such awards of attorney's fees is that they be "reasonable" as expressly contemplated by the statute in question.
-
Redding v. Cade
158 So. 2d 880
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
the penalty attorney fee is fixed and determined "upon the basis of the attorney's skill and the amount of work performed by him in the prosecution *886 and collection of the total claim".
-
Milliet v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.
148 So. 2d 825
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Bigham v. Swift & Company, 229 La.
-
Stockstill v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
144 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
See *921 , ; Murry v. Southern Pulpwood Ins.
-
Barbara v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.
137 So. 2d 466
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Broussard v. Dumas Chevrolet Company, supra.
- Berry v. Higgins, Inc. 136 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Murry v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company
136 So. 2d 165
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Co., , ; Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.
-
Shuff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
134 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
2 Cir., , affirmed, , ; Patterson v. Cargo Services, Inc., La.App.Orl., ."
-
Fruge v. Hub City Iron Works, Inc.
131 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
2 Cir., , affirmed, , ; Patterson v. Cargo Services, Inc., La.App.Orleans, ; Gloston v. Coal Operators Cas.
-
Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Company
125 So. 2d 664
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
Co., , ; Monk v. Louisiana Forestry Commission, La.App.
-
Finn v. Delta Drilling Company
121 So. 2d 340
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
see also, Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.