DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Wilson, 118 So. 2d 450.

49 citing documents.

  • Carpenter v. Besco Corp. 521 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    1st Cir.1957), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, , concluded that medical testimony as to a “ ‘definite possibility’ ” of the existence of a condition, although it does not meet the alleged test of proving something with a reasonable certainty, nonetheless goes to the weight rather than to the admissibility of the evidence, the preponderance
  • Veals v. Manis 437 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    555 , (1972); , (1960); (La.App.
  • Williams v. United States P. & I. Agency, Inc. 424 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Chaney v. Cunningham 411 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    (1960).” We find from the evidence in the record that the trial court did not commit manifest error in finding contributory negligence on the part of Virginia Chaney; she was negligent in executing her passing maneuver under the circumstances of this case and this negligence bars her recovery.
  • Touchette v. Braud 382 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    133, (1963); , (1960); (La.App.
  • Bodin v. Dauphine 351 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Bamburg v. Nelson 313 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    133 , (1963); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Morgan v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 317 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Distinguished Wilson v. Jones 294 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    The cases of Scrantz v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, La.App., ; Ulmer v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., , , , are clearly distinguishable on the facts from instant case.
  • Messina v. Chauppette 284 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
    261 , ; , ; ; Zurich Insurance Co. v. Grain Dealers Mutual Ins.
  • Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Company 277 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    133 , (1963); , (1960); Nain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 241 So.
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    1071 , (1972); , (1960); Hollabaugh-Seale Funeral Home v. Standard Acc.
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    1071 , (1972); , (1960); Hollabaugh-Seale Funeral Home v. Standard Acc.
  • Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Flournoy v. Otero 212 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    133 , *562 (1963); , (1960).
  • Ginlee v. Helg 203 So. 2d 714 La. 1967
    See, e. g., , ; Kinchen v. Cottle, La.App., ; Williams v. Lafauci, La.App., ; Crier v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., ; Crane v. London, La.App., ; Sanders v. Hisaw, La.App., .
  • Cotton v. Bartoneau 199 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , ; Jenkins v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., 1 Cir., 1957, ; Johnson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., 3 Cir., 1960, .” We do not think this rule has any application here.
  • Cashio v. Moody 190 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. 183 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Also, , , where both parties were guilty of negligence continuing to the moment of the accident and at the time each discovered or should have discovered the other's peril, it was too late to avoid the accident, the court held the doctrine of last clear chance did not apply.
  • Hoover v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 185 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Fulgium v. Lamb 179 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    379 , (1957); , (1960); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Gorum v. Pritchard 173 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    2d 674 (1st Cir.1957), reversed at , on other grounds, i. e., that the left turning driver had already started his turn and was across the center line when he struck the following vehicle which was attempting to pass.
  • Evans v. Thorpe 175 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    (1960); Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Kimball v. Landreneau 170 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    See Johnson v. Wilson, supra [ , ].
  • Williams v. Lafauci 166 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Pinard v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Hernandez v. Hood, La.App., ; Baumann v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., ; Bonstaff v. Hawkins, La.App., ; LSA-R.S.
  • LeLeux v. Travelers Insurance Co. 162 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co. 157 So. 2d 467 La. 1963
    379 , ; , and Gaspard v. LeMaire et al., 1963, 245 La.
  • Boyle v. Travelers Insurance Co. 157 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Dempster v. Beauboeuf 155 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    However, this case was reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court, , , on facts identical with those here.
  • Moorehouse v. Gallow 156 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Ulmer v. Travelers Insurance Company 156 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    " , (1960), the Supreme Court held that a left-turning driver cannot discharge his burden by making his observation some distance from the intersection, but he is required to look to his rear immediately before attempting any turn across the center line of the highway."
  • Barras v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 152 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Bellard v. Texas Services, Inc. 151 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    * * * ” , ; Thomas v. Barnett, 240 La.
  • Mitchell v. National Surety Corp 149 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    379 , (1957); , (1960); Johnson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1960); Stevens v. Dowden, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1960); Liddell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., (4th Cir. 1961); and LSA-R.S.
  • Hudgens v. Mayeaux 143 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    See, e. g., , and Washington Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Ins.
  • Burton v. Allstate Insurance Co. 139 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    1 Cir., (reversed on facts, , ), the decisions involving the negligence of a left-turning driver were analyzed as falling into three general patterns, -679: “(1) Cases holding that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the negligence of the driver turning left suddenly and/or without signal and in the immediate
  • Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. George W. Foshee Lumber Co. 136 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    379 , ; , ; Jenkins v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y., La.App.
  • Guidry v. United States Casualty Co. 134 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    379 , (1957); , (1960); LSA-R.S.
  • Davis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 134 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Boudreaux v. Davis 134 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    A similar situation was presented in the recent case of Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , , in which the Court held as follows: ■ “ ‘ * * * But, of course, defendant did not have the legal right to commence a left turn by driving over the center line when confronted with an unfavorable traffic condition and, had he checked to his rear, just before turning, he would have realized that t
  • Sonnier v. Great American Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    379 , ; Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , ; Johnson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., La.App.
  • Deshotels v. United States Fire Insurance Company 132 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    A similar situation was presented in the recent case of Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , , in which the Court held as follows: "* * * But, of course, defendant did not have the legal right to commence a left turn by driving over the center line when confronted with an unfavorable traffic condition and, had he checked to his rear, just before turning, he would have realized that the Jo
  • North River Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 132 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    379 , ; , ; Jenkins v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y., La.App.
  • Chapman v. Chapman 130 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Ruple v. Travelers Indemnity Company 129 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Finally, the Supreme Court in the case of Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , , reversing the decision of the First Circuit in La.App., , held as follows: "It is seen from the statement of defendant * * * that he felt that, when he had given a hand signal indicating his intention to make a left turn, he was entitled to engage in that maneuver irrespective of th
  • Johnson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 124 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    379 , ; Johnson v. Wilson, 1960, , ; LSA-R.S.
  • Self v. Johnson 124 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    1 Cir., , reversed on other grounds , ; Matherne v. Crowther, La.App.
  • Papillion v. Papillion 124 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    A; , , reversing La.App.
  • Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co. 121 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960