Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee, 102 So. 2d 755.

25 citing documents.

Williams v. Morrell 971 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Jenkins v. Williamson-Butler 883 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Adkins v. Huckabay 755 So. 2d 206 La. 2000
( , (1958)) (internal quotations omitted).
Higginbotham v. Morris 749 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
1st Cir. 1980); , (1958).
Savage v. Edwards 722 So. 2d 1004 La. 1998
Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee, 232 La.
Savage v. Edwards 728 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
(1958); Garrison v. Connick, supra ; Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee, 232 La.
Valence v. Rosiere 675 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
(1958); Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee, 232 La.
Wayne v. Green 389 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Kelly v. Village of Greenwood 363 So. 2d 887 La. 1978
1541 , 51 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977); , (1958); Lewis v. Democratic Executive Comm., 232 La.
Moreau v. Tonry 339 So. 2d 3 La. 1976
See Garrison v. Connick, La., (1974); , (1958); Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee, 232 La.
LaCaze v. Johnson 310 So. 2d 86 La. 1974
-763 (1958), Chief Justice Fournet, writing for the majority, stated: "As a general proposition it may be stated that, in the absence of specific facts giving rise to fraud or which cast uncertainty on the result, irregularities in an election will not affect the validity of a nomination or serve t
Allen v. Gleason 293 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
...” [ 557 ] The principles generally applied by the jurisprudence regarding the conditions precedent to affording relief to a , (1958) as follows: “As a general proposition it may be stated that, in the absence of specific facts giving rise to fraud or which cast uncertainty on the result, irregularities in an election will not affect the validity of a nomination or serve to nullify the result (Daigle v. Mayor and Board of Aide
Garrison v. Connick 291 So. 2d 778 La. 1974
(1958): "As a general proposition it may be stated that, in the absence of specific facts giving rise to fraud or which cast uncertainty on the result, irregularities in an election will not affect the validity of a nomination or serve to nullify the result (Daigle v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of Tow
Garrison v. Connick 288 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1960), , (1958), permits the filing of a supplemental and amended petition where the amended pleadings particularize or amplify the original allegations.
Dubois v. Falgout 268 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
After stating that adultery is a serious matter entailing grievous consequences, he said, “the degree of proof necessary is almost equal to that in a criminal proceeding.” , 102 * (1958), the Louisiana Supreme Court was presented with a case of alleged election fraud based upon circumstantial evidence.
Tafaro's Investment Co. v. Division of Housing Improvement 259 So. 2d 57 La. 1972
1058 , ; , ; Aucoin v. Dunn, 255 La.
Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
1058 , ; , ; Aucoin v. Dunn, 255 La.
Dupre v. City of Houma 216 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
379 , ; , , No. 44,006 on our docket, t.he decree in which was handed down March 20, 1958, and the authorities therein cited.
Love v. Cross 158 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The plaintiff thus seeks to place himself under the doctrine that an entire election will be declared null “if the Court finds the proven frauds and irregularities are of such a serious nature as to deprive the voters of the free expression of their will”, , 102 So.
Timberlake v. Lindsey 140 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The jurisprudence also provides, however, that “in the absence of specific facts giving rise to fraud or which cast uncertainty on the result, irregularities in an election will not affect the validity of a nomination or serve to nullify the result * * * (citations omitted.);” , .
Burch v. McClendon 123 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Downs v. Pharis 122 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
In Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee, 1958, , 102 So.
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo 120 So. 2d 262 La. 1960
Smith v. Washington Parish Democratic Committee 120 So. 2d 257 La. 1960
667 .)” Plaintiff, in support of his position, , , 765 to-wit: “We also find it unnecessary to discuss further the failure of commissioners to sign the precinct register after the voter has placed his signature thereon, and to enter the date 'of the election in the proper space, other than to say that such gross irregularities cannot be condoned.
Patterson v. City of De Ridder 103 So. 2d 68 La. 1958
379 , ; , , No. 44,006 on our docket, the decree in which was handed down March 20, 1958, with the written reasons therefor being released April 21, 1958, and the authorities therein cited.