DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ewald v. Hodges, 120 So. 2d 465.

17 citing documents.

  • Hubbs v. Canova 401 So. 2d 962 La. 1981
    (1960); Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Butler, 234 La.
  • Shell Oil Co. v. Hebert 373 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    1056 , (1963); , (1960); Sun Oil Co. v. Roger, 239 La.
  • Grieshaber v. Cannon 346 So. 2d 166 La. 1977
  • Jackson v. D'AUBIN 338 So. 2d 575 La. 1976
    116 , (1970); , (1960); Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Company, 235 La.
  • Grieshaber v. Cannon 339 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Verret v. Norwood 311 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    679, 681 (1910); see also, , (1960); (La.
  • Noe v. Roussel 299 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    * * *.'" , (1960), although not controlling of the ultimate decision therein, the Supreme Court stated in referring to the acquisition of title at tax sale of property of the corporation that: "`At the outset, it must be conceded that as against the Riggs Cypress Company, Ltd., and its stockholders, William Davis
  • Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
    Choate v. O'Brien, La.App., (4th Cir. 1964); , (1960); Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Butler, 234 La.
  • Mayo v. Stoessell 277 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Choate v. O'Brien, La.App., (4th Cir. 1964); , (1960); Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Butler, 234 La.
  • Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 232 So. 2d 67 La. 1970
  • Vavoline Oil Co. v. Concordia Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    322 , ; , ; Staring v. Grace, [La.App.]
  • Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    Choate v. O'Brien, La.App., (4th Cir.1964); , (1960); Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Butler, 234 La.
  • P. M. Realty Co. v. Devitt 199 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    322 , ; , ; Staring v. Grace, La.App., ; Stone v. Kimball’s Heirs, 199 La.
  • Gaudet v. Lawes 197 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    o. 832 , as follows: ‘Moreover, it is immaterial (for the purposes of prescription under article 233 of the Constitution of 1898) whether the assessment has been made in the name of one person, or another, or in no name, or whether the owner, not in possession, has been notified, or whether the sale has been advertised or has not been advertised.’ ” Also in Ewald, et al. v. Hodges, et al., (1960) , , the Supreme Court said: “[11] ‘Another factor that fortifies the tax sale is the inaction of the
  • Choate v. O'BRIEN 163 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • Fitch v. Broussard 156 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    and Resweber v. Jacob, La.App.
  • Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    the adjudicatee at a tax sale was the liquidator of the tax debtor corporation.