Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bartley, Incorporated v. Town of Westlake, 111 So. 2d 328.

14 citing documents.

Donahue v. BOARD OF LEVEE COM'RS OF ORLEANS, ETC. 413 So. 2d 488 La. 1982
Coney v. State 385 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1968); Bartley, , (1959).
Pelican Aviation Corp. v. Airport Authority for the Parish of Iberia 372 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Bartley, , (1959); Hall v. Rosteet, 247 La.
Cogswell v. Town of Logansport 321 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Tide Equipment Co. v. Pointe Coupee Par. Police Jury 312 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Parenthetically, relative to the appellant's prayer that the defendant be directed to accept its bid and to enter into a contract with it for the purchase of the appellant's tractor, our Supreme Court dealt with that matter in the case of Bartley, Inc., v. Town of Westlake, , (1959).
DJ Talley & Son, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 303 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
9 , (1949); Bartley, , (1959).
New Orleans Transfer Company, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
9 , (1949), and in the case of Bartley, , (1959).
GURTLER, HEBERT & CO., INC. v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 251 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess 202 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
* * * ” To the same effect see Bartley, , .
Hall v. Rosteet 169 So. 2d 903 La. 1964
Finally, it is contended that the airport leasing and the general leasing provisions of the Revised Statutes should be read as simultaneous expressions of the legislative will, so that the provisions of both should be given effect where not in conflict, Bartley, , .
Hall v. Rosteet 169 So. 2d 903 La. 1964
Finally, it is contended that the airport leasing and the general leasing provisions of the Revised Statutes should be read as simultaneous expressions of the legislative will, so that the provisions of both should be given effect where not in conflict, Bartley, , .
Hall v. Rosteet 169 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Finally, it is contended that the airport leasing and the general leasing-provisions of the Revised Statutes should be read as simultaneous expressions of the-legislative will, so that the provisions of both should be given effect where not in conflict, Bartley, , .
CHF Finance Company v. Jochum 127 So. 2d 534 La. 1961
Collector of Revenue v. Olvey 117 So. 2d 563 La. 1959