Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spinato v. Lowe, 119 So. 2d 480.

32 citing documents.

St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. GAF Corp. 512 So. 2d 1165 La. 1987
279 , (1971); , (1960); State v. Board of Supervisors, LSU & A & M College, 228 La.
Redfearn v. Creppel 436 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
City of Lake Charles v. Frank, supra ; writ granted, other grounds, , ; City of New Orleans v. Langenstein, supra .
Bleachers Club of Monroe, Ltd. v. City of Monroe 426 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
(1960) and its progeny are clear authority for our holding.
Jones v. Natchitoches Parish Police Jury 371 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1961); , (1960).
Horne v. La. State Bd. of Elem. and SEC. Ed. 357 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Salsul Co. v. Kohlmeyer & Co. 354 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Boothe v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF ELECTIONS, ETC. 341 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1960); Cain v. Board of Supervisors, Ouachita Parish, (La.App.
Mitchell v. Bertolla 328 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
(1960), the Supreme Court declared: "In the present case it would serve no useful purpose for this Court to determine whether the plaintiff should have been issued a liquor permit for the year 1959 for any decree which this Court would render, if we were to find merit in plaintiff's contentions, would
Hickman v. Fletcher 317 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Unity Markets, Inc. v. Lenard 316 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1960): “In the present case it would serve no useful purpose for this Court to determine whether the plaintiff should have been issued a liquor permit for the year 1959 for any decree which this Court would render, if we were to find merit in plaintiff’s contentions, would be unenforceable.
Ardoin v. Ardoin 306 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
317 , (1971); , (1960); (La.App.
Cooper v. Cooper 303 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State v. Petition for Judicial Commitment of Fletcher 289 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1960) ; State v. Melerine, 238 La.
State v. Commitment (Jackson) 289 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Brumfield v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 265 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
He urges to us this principle based upon the pronouncement of the courts in the following cases: , (1960); Pellegrin v. City of Gretna, 222 La.
State ex rel. Watts v. Jackson 261 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
State v. Ward 249 So. 2d 921 La. 1971
(1960); State v. Melerine, 238 La.
Breaux v. Town of Oberlin 247 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
(1960) and cases cited therein.
Moncla v. City of Lafayette 241 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Thigpen v. DeSoto Parish Police Jury 222 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
See Hines v. Village of Goldonna (La.App.3 Cir.1961), ; Spinato d/b/a El Morocco Bar & Lounge v. Lowe, Collector of Revenue for the City of New Orleans (1960), , .
Barlotta v. Jefferson Parish Council 212 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
There are a number of decisions on this phase of the subject, a few of which are as follows: DiGiovanni v. Parish of Jefferson, La.App., ; , ; Pellegrin v. City of Gretna, 222 La.
Behler v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 207 So. 2d 758 La. 1968
876 , ; , ; Heard v. Seegers (La.App.
Danna v. Commissioner of Insurance 207 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Actions § 17c, page 1016, which, in part, states: “A moot case * * * is a case or question in or on which there is no real controversy; a case which seeks to determine an abstract question which does not rest on existing facts or rights, * * In the case of Spinato v. Lowe (1960) , , the Supreme Court at stated: “In the present case it would serve no useful purpose for this Court to determine whether the plaintiff should have been issued a liquor permit for the year 1959 for any decree which this
Ice Service Corp. v. Town of Hodge 174 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
(1960) we conclude the question presented is moot.
Digiovanni v. Parish of Jefferson 151 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1963
Allen v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 141 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
and Pellegrin v. City of Gretna, 222 La.
Voorhies Electrical Contracting, Inc. v. Town of Bunkie 136 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Hines v. Village of Goldonna, La.App.
Hines v. Village of Goldonna 136 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Taylor v. Metoyer 127 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
and numerous cases therein cited.
Jefferson v. Tennant 127 So. 2d 155 La. 1961
State ex rel. Conforto v. City of New Orleans 124 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Spinato v. Lowe 123 So. 2d 884 La. 1960