Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, 120 So. 2d 262.

26 citing documents.

Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Caddo Parish, , (1960); Lachney v. Motor Parts and Bearing Supply, Inc., (La.App.
Adkins v. Huckabay 755 So. 2d 206 La. 2000
No. 2 of Caddo Parish, , -71 (1960), this Court disposed of a multitude of alleged ministerial irregularities ranging from swearing in of commissioners to the canvassing of the returns wherein we stated "in the absence of fraud, corruption or proof that the irregularities complained of would have changed the result of the
State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 639 So. 2d 707 La. 1994
No. 2 of Caddo Parish, , (1960).
Lenian v. Cajun Contractors, Inc. 572 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Also in support of its motion for summary judgment, the police jury cited Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of the Parish of Caddo, , (1960), in which the supreme court held that the statute which recognized the police jury as the governing authority of a parochial sewerage district was contrary to and in irrecon-ciliable conflict with amendments which transferred functions of the governing authority of the sewerage district to a boa
Green v. Louisiana Underwriters Ins. Co. 571 So. 2d 610 La. 1990
No. 2 of the Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
Hayden v. Richland Parish School Bd. 554 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
See Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960); State v. Randall, 219 La.
Parker v. Cappel 500 So. 2d 771 La. 1987
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
State v. Union Tank Car Co. 439 So. 2d 377 La. 1983
No. 2 of Caddo Parish, , Lachney v. Motor Parts & Bearing Supply, Inc., (La.App.
Johnston v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury 424 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Fakier v. Picou, 166 So.2d *1057 257 (La.1964); Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo
State, in Interest of Bruno 388 So. 2d 784 La. 1980
1st Cir. 1976); Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
Braxton v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
See CC Art. 18; Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
Charbonnet v. Braden 358 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
841 , at page 271: "It has frequently been observed by us that in the absence of fraud, corruption or proof that the irregularities complained of would have changed the result of the election, the election will not be set aside solely because of the failure of some ministerial officer to perform every formal direc
State v. Skinner 358 So. 2d 280 La. 1978
569 , (1962); Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
Board of Trustees of Fin. Auth. v. All Taxpayers 336 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
569 , ; Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , .
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc. 292 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
430 (1907); Johnson v. Sewerage District #2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960)
Simion v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 286 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , ; Post Office Employees Credit Union v. Morris, La.App., 183 So.
State, Department of Highways v. Mertens 271 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
430 (1907); Johnson Sewerage District #2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960); (La.App.
Abbott v. Parker 249 So. 2d 908 La. 1971
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2, , (1960).
Dupre v. City of Houma 216 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
at page 271, the Supreme Court of Louisiana states: ‘It has frequently been observed by us that in the absence of fraud, corruption or proof that the irregularities complained of would have changed the result of the election, the election will not be set aside solely because of the failure of some mi
James v. Orange Savings & Loan Ass'n 195 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , .
Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission 175 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
430 ; Johnson v. Sewerage District #2, Caddo Parish, , ; National Car Rental System v. City of New Orleans, La.App., .
Sewerage District No. One of Rapides Parish v. Afco Corp. 177 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
See Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2, of Parish of Caddo, , , noted 21 La.L.
Miller v. Colonial Pipeline Company 173 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
The jurisprudence is established that all statutory provisions should be given effect, whenever they can be given a reasonable interpretation, Johnson v. Sewage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo, , (1960).
Binnings Construction Co. v. Sewerage District No. I of Parish of St. Charles 174 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
At that time, if you were then in a position to go ahead with the work, we would seek an equitable adjustment to our Contract, and that failing this, you would then re-advertise the work.” On April 25, 1960, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court in the Johnson case and dismissed plaintiff’s suit ( , ).
National Car Rental Sys., Inc. v. City of New Orleans 160 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
430 ; Johnson v. Sewerage District #2, Caddo Parish, , .
Timberlake v. Lindsey 140 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
As stated in Johnson v. Sewerage District, etc., , , “It has frequently been observed by us that in the absence of fraud, corruption or proof that the irregularities complained of would have changed the result of the election, the election will not be set aside solely because of the failure of some ministerial officer to perform every formal direc