45406
Precedential
Processed
State v. Robertson
State v. Robertson, 128 So. 2d 646 (La. 1961).
Cited by
- In the Matter of Two (2) Canines Seized from Susan Graham, Rayville, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State v. Kennedy 803 So. 2d 916 La. 2001
- State v. Carr 761 So. 2d 1271 La. 2000
- City of Baton Rouge v. DiVincenti 697 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Campbell 670 So. 2d 1212 La. 1996
- State v. Campbell 657 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- State v. Skinner 358 So. 2d 280 La. 1978
- State v. Jenkins 338 So. 2d 276 La. 1976
- Tally v. Lovette 332 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Connick v. Lucky Pierre's 331 So. 2d 431 La. 1976
- Sevin v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n 283 So. 2d 690 La. 1973
- State v. Levi 250 So. 2d 751 La. 1971
Opinion text
HAMITER, Justice (dissenting). In my opinion LRS 14:129, which denounces jury tampering, is clear, explicit, definite and, hence, not unconstitutional. The language of the statute, when considered as a whole and in the light of common usage as must be done, can and does mean only that a person is prohibited from improperly resorting to conduct that purposes to sway or persuade (the word “influence” is so defined in Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition— Unabridged) any petit juror with respect to a jury verdict in the rendition of which he has been chosen to participate. I respectfully dissent.