DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink, 134 So. 2d 880.

74 citing documents.

  • Tktmj, Inc. v. the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    Airco Refrigeration Service, So.2d 880 (1961); (La.
  • ETI, Inc. v. Buck Steel, Inc. 211 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 3 Cir.1981); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).” Id., Id., 526 So.2d at 241 .
  • Allstate Enterprises, Inc. v. Brown 907 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Mayeux v. McInnis, 00-1540 (La.App.
  • Peterson Contractors, Inc. v. Herd Producing Co., Inc. 811 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc., , (1961) (citations omitted).
  • Mayeaux v. McInnis 809 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Airco Refrigeration Serv., , (1961); O & M Const., Inc. v. State, Div. of Admin., (La.App.
  • Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    3d Cir.1981); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Smith v. Arcadian Corp. 657 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    3 Cir.1981); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).'
  • Ortego v. Dupont 611 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (La.App.
  • O & M CONST. v. State, Div. of Admin. 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • O & M Construction, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Blue v. Schoen 556 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    3 Cir. 1980) —a contract to build a fireplace not considered to be a sale; Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961)—a contract to install defendant's air-conditioner not a sale; Martin v. Earl J. Rome, Jr., D.D.S., (La.App.
  • Alonzo v. Chifici 526 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    App. 3 Cir.1981); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961)."
  • Wike v. Joseph 516 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Keating v. Miller, supra.
  • Huguet v. Musso Partnership 509 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    See Airco Refrigeration Serv., , (1961); (La.App.
  • American Druggists Ins. Co. v. Henry Contracting, Inc. 505 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Article 2769; Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Neel v. O'Quinn, supra.
  • Tenneco Oil Co. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. 495 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Hebert v. McDaniel 479 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1150 , (1970); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Acadiana Health Club, Inc. v. Hebert 469 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    3 Cir.1981); Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • B & B Cut Stone Co., Inc. v. Resneck 465 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Richard v. Bourda 451 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Airco Refrigeration, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Gibbens Pools, Inc. v. Corrington 446 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Art. 2769; Airco Refrigeration Service, , Pete's Plumbing & Heating, (La.App.
  • Daspit Bros. v. Lionel J. Favret Const. 436 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • National Roofing & Siding Co. v. Gros 433 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    See Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Rudy Brown Builders, Inc., v. St.
  • Campagna v. Smallwood 428 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Art. 2769; Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Rudy Brown Builders v. St. Bernard Linen 428 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Spurlock 424 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The factors to be considered in determining whether there has been substantial performance were delineated in Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961), and include the extent of the defect or nonperformance, the degree to which non-performance has defeated the purpose of the contract, the ease of correction, and the use or benefit to the owner of the work already performed.
  • Walter Lafargue Real Estate, Inc. v. Raines 420 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Article 2769; Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Neel v. O'Quinn, supra.
  • Pelican Elec. Contractors v. Neumeyer 419 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    The first contention of defendants, that Pelican breached the contract and should not recover under it, presents the factual question of whether there was substantial performance by Pelican because, , (1961): ...
  • Rothman v. Hebert 415 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Ai rco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (1st Cir. 1976).
  • Pete's Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Geissert 413 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Rapides Const., Inc. v. Gaspard 411 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    3rd Cir., 1980); Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink, [ ]
  • DESIGN & CORROSION ENG., INC. v. Piggly Wiggly of Mansfield, Inc. 408 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Lane Wilson Co., (La.App.
  • Cerdes v. Wright 408 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Bynog v. Adley 406 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Art. 2769 provides as follows: “If an undertaker fails to do the work he has contracted to do, or if he does not execute it in the manner and at the time he has agreed to do it, he shall be liable in damages for the losses that may ensue from his non-compliance with his contract.” In Aireo Refrigeration Service, , (1961), the court summarized the law applicable to cases controlled by Article 2769 as follows: “...
  • Duhon v. Three Friends Homebuilders Corp. 396 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1970), writ denied Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Barber Bros. Contracting Co. v. Chet Homes, Inc. 393 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Merrydale Glass Works, (La.App.
  • Primeaux v. Gaspard 385 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); (La.App.
  • Martin v. AAA Brick Co., Inc. 386 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Airco Refrigeration Service, *991 , (1961) .
  • Planning Systems Corp. v. Murrell 374 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (La.App.
  • Sibille v. Meyer 355 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    The situation is governed by the provision of Civil Code Art. 2769 from which the following rules were extracted in the case of Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961): “[1,2] The contract involved in the instant case is a building contract within the definition of Article 2756 of the LSA-Civil Code.
  • Merrydale Glass Works, Inc. v. Merriam 349 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961); Franklin v. Mackie, supra .
  • Greer v. Rohrer 346 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    1150 , ; and, Airco Refrigeration Service, , (La.
  • Dickson v. Moran 344 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Henson v. Gonzalez 326 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The defendant has argued in Papa and Mangin, supra, and in Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961), that the determinative factor in finding a construction contract rather than a sale is the installation of the product (patio cover, floor furnaces and air conditioner, respectively) on the premises as a necessary antecedent to use of the object.
  • Lane Wilson Company, Inc. v. Gregory 322 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    In Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961), the supreme court considered Article 2769 and the meaning of "substantial performance."
  • Neel v. O'QUINN 313 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Lambert v. JONES-McCLOSKEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 311 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    85 , ; Airco Refrigeration Service, , ; Scott Fence & Insulation Co., Inc. v. Boudro, La.App., ; Sullivan v. Carpenter, La.App., .
  • Keating v. Miller 292 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    3rd Cir. 1967); , (1961).
  • CO-OPERATIVE C. STOR, BLDRS., INC. v. Arcadia Foods, Inc. 291 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Airco Refrigeration Service, , (1961).
  • Cortiza v. Rosenblat 291 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    176 , ; Graham v. Lieber, La.App., ; Rocquin v. Simmons, La.App., ; Airco Refrigeration Service, , affirmed , .