Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 137 So. 2d 298.
-
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
738 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
(1962), Louisiana courts generally determined liability by using the proximate cause approach, wherein the third and fourth elements were combined into a single inquiry.
-
Guerra v. White
755 So. 2d 894
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
(1962), and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, 260 La.
-
Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan
733 So. 2d 1198
La. 1999
4/16/87), , rehearing denied 5/28/87; , (1962).
- Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- EP v. City of Lafayette 722 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Melancon v. City of Lafayette
719 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
(1962); Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
- Daye v. General Motors Corp. 720 So. 2d 654 La. 1998
- Spradlin v. ACADIA ST. LANDRY MED. FOUND. 711 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Graves v. Page
703 So. 2d 566
La. 1997
In the landmark case, , (1962), this court enunciated certain principles that we still use to analyze accidents with multiple causes.
-
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc.
702 So. 2d 1024
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962); Anthony v. Hospital Service Dist.
-
Faye v. State, Department of Transportation & Development
702 So. 2d 1036
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
- Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler 701 So. 2d 1308 La. 1997
-
Boteler v. Rivera
700 So. 2d 913
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
A) , (1962) and Hill v. Lundin & Associates, 260 La.
-
Todd v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
699 So. 2d 35
La. 1997
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
- Riser v. Acadiana Limousine Service 693 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
Todd v. State
685 So. 2d 313
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
-
Trahan v. McManus
689 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
651 So.2d at 874 ( , (1962)).
-
Stroik v. Ponseti
683 So. 2d 1342
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Fontenot v. Fontenot, 93-2479 (La.4/11/94)
-
Daigrepont v. State
688 So. 2d 1290
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962).
- Mayes v. State 685 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services
685 So. 2d 310
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
-
Hayes v. City of Baton Rouge
683 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Dixie Drive It *904 , 242 La.
-
Martin v. David
685 So. 2d 158
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
See, , (1962) ("[w]hen the actionable negligence of two tortfeasors contributes in causing harm to a third party, each of them is responsible for the damage.
- Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 673 So. 2d 585 La. 1996
- Sanders v. Spector 673 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-
Foster v. ConAgra Poultry Co.
670 So. 2d 471
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
-
Manuel v. Shell Oil Co.
664 So. 2d 470
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
al factor leading to the injuries, citing Thomas v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 466 So.2d *475 1280, 1285 (La.1985); and Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co.
-
Sloan v. Dailey
664 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(1962); Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
-
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center
662 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962), to show that those injuries or death were "connected with the original harm."
- Miller v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 663 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
-
Saden v. Kirby
660 So. 2d 423
La. 1995
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
- Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 657 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
Parmer v. Suse
657 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962).
-
Durapau v. Jenkins
656 So. 2d 1067
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
In his reasons for judgment he applied the duty-risk analysis mandated for negligence actions by Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962), and thus made the following four-step sequential inquiry: 1.
-
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University
655 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Roberts, supra; Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962); (La.App.
-
Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd.
650 So. 2d 712
La. 1995
(1962), Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
-
Hasha v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
651 So. 2d 865
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(1962), cause in fact was explained as follows: "Negligent conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm ...
- Jackson v. Ferrand 658 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- Peterson v. Doe 647 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Juneau v. Strawmyer
647 So. 2d 1294
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992); on rehearing; , (1967).
- Brooks v. Henson Fashion Floors, Inc. 647 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
Cornish v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOP. & DEV.
647 So. 2d 1170
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962).
-
Niven v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co.
646 So. 2d 1108
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
-
Quick v. Murphy Oil Co.
643 So. 2d 1291
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
(1962); Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., 259 La.
-
Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co.
641 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
(1962), explained cause-in-fact as follows: "Negligent conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm....
-
Rich v. Tench Elec. Motor Works, Inc.
642 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
(1962); Ladner v. Firemen's Ins.
- Greer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 641 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994