Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 137 So. 2d 298.

561 citing documents.

Enlow v. Blaney 527 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Dixie Drive it Yourself System New Orleans, , (1962)."
George v. Western Auto Supply Co., Inc. 527 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
Wilson v. Cline 527 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Martyniuk v. DL-Mud, Inc. 526 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
471 , (1970); , (1962); (La.App.
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. 528 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
v. American Beverage Co.
Foster v. COLONEL SANDERS KY. FRIED CHICKEN, INC. 526 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Michel v. Ascension Parish Police Jury 524 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).
Gresham v. Davenport 524 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
[La.1962]; Pierre v. Allstate Ins.
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1962)....Third party fault under La.C.C.
Leman v. Allstate Insurance Co. 522 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Scales v. St. John 522 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1986); Dixie Drive It Yourself System, v. American Beverage Co., , Becnel v. St.
Murjani v. Thibeaux 521 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See Forest v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, Dixie Drive It Yourself System, , (1962); Crowe, The Anatomy of a Tort, 22 Loy.L.Rev.
Brady v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health & Human Resources Administration 525 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
542 , (1972); Dixie Drive It Yourself System, , (1962).
Ladner v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark 519 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co.
David v. Reon 520 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Irving v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 517 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Ishee v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
St. Pierre v. Lombard 512 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Paige v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 512 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Sanchez v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources, C.A. 506 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962), the Supreme Court adopted the duty/risk analysis for determining tort liability which involves the following inquiries: (1) Was defendant’s action a cause- *779 in-fact of plaintiffs injury — was it a substantial factor in bringing about the harm; (2) Do the risk and harm encountered by plainti
Florists' Mutual Insurance Co. v. Homecraft Corp. 506 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
They are solidarily liable.” Dixie Drive It Yourself *749 , (1962).
Sanchez v. STATE, DEPT. OF H. & HR 506 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962), the Supreme Court adopted the duty/risk analysis for determining tort liability which involves the following inquiries: (1) Was defendant's action a cause-in-fact *779 of plaintiff's injurywas it a substantial factor in bringing about the harm; (2) Do the risk and harm encountered by plaintiff
Soileau v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 509 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Chatelain v. PROJECT SQUARE 505 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Dixie Drive-It-Yourself System v. American Beverage Company
Hammer v. City of Lafayette 502 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
(1962); Quinn v. State, Through Dept. of Highways, (La.App.
Jefferson v. Antee 502 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 501 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962); Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1973); , (1962); Ishee v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
Snyder v. Bergeron 501 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1978); Dixie Drive it Yourself System New Orleans, , (1962).
Maxwell v. State, Department of Transportaiton & Development 499 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Dixie Drive It Yourself System vs. American Beverage Co. [ ]
Hastings v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 498 So. 2d 713 La. 1986
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962); Anthony v. Hospital Service Dist.
Broussard v. Northwest Insurance Co. 496 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hutson v. Madison Parish Police Jury 496 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
In Hayes , the court noted the following with respect to the definition of cause in fact: , (1962), cause-in-fact was explained as follows: " Negligent conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm....
Harrigan v. Freeman 498 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hebert v. Belk Const. Co., Inc. 499 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962); Conner v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas.
Phillips v. Roy 494 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Beverage Co., , (1962); (La.App.
Williams v. Southfield School, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
471 , (1970) , 137 * (1962), requires that we inquire into the ease of associating the risk with the duty and into how appropriate the duty is to the risk.
Forest v. STATE EX REL. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 493 So. 2d 563 La. 1986
Dixie Drive It Yourself System, , (1962); Pierre v. Allstate Insurance Co., 257 La.
Lee v. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. 493 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
(1962); Ward v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway, supra.
Keith v. Bearden 488 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
(1962); and Everett v. La.
Domingue v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 490 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
3rd Cir. 1984) writ denied Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co., , (1962).
LaFleur v. John Deere Co. 491 So. 2d 624 La. 1986
Dixie Drive It Yourself System, , (1962); Cooks, Mental Anguish Arising From Property Damage, 3 So.
Shafouk Nor El Din Hamza v. Bourgeois 493 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
(1962); Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., supra; La.C.C.
Lucey v. Harris 490 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
App. 2nd Cir.1984); , (1962).
Schiro v. Travelers Ins. Co. 489 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Marzula v. White 488 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
[6] , (1962); Shaw v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc., 252 La.
Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.471, (1962).
Forest v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 483 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1962), cause in fact was explained as follows: “Negligent conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm_ [T]he negligent conduct is undoubtedly a substantial factor in bringing about the collision if the collision would not have occurred witho
Walpole v. Bituminous Casualty Corp. 482 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962), discussed by Professor Malone in Ruminations on Dixie Drive It Yourself Versus American Beverage Company, 30 La.L.Rev.
Ballew v. Southland Corp. 482 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
v. American Beverage Co., , (1962).