Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Viser v. Viser, 146 So. 2d 409.
-
Williams v. Williams
541 So. 2d 928
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
(1962) (overruled as to a *930 separate issue, in Miller v. Miller, 321 So.
-
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Saxon
500 So. 2d 379
La. 1987
411 , (1963); , (1962); Wischer v. Madison Realty Company, 242 La.
-
Conner v. Conner
499 So. 2d 312
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In contending the trial court erred, , (1962).
-
Andrew v. Andrew
486 So. 2d 230
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Cassidy v. Cassidy, supra; Viser v. Viser, 243 La.706, (1962).
-
Cassidy v. Cassidy
477 So. 2d 84
La. 1985
(1962), this court determined that marriage and its attendant obligation of support continues during an appeal of a divorce judgment.
-
Whipple v. Whipple
451 So. 2d 1306
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The court in Morris concluded that alimony pendente lite continued to accrue while the appeal was pending
-
Bateman v. Larson
452 So. 2d 184
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
App. 4th Cir.1982); writs granted , (1962); (La.App.
-
Williams v. Williams
431 So. 2d 780
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
[706], ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., 211 La.
-
Morgan v. Morgan
428 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
*1187 The Supreme Court in Viser v. Viser, 2 , when confronted with a similar circumstance as that found here, held the wife’s entitlement to alimony pendente lite continued to a final determination in the divorce action.
- Criticized Morris v. Morris 426 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Sumrall v. Sumrall 393 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Post v. Post
376 So. 2d 1275
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
760 (1935); , (1962); (La.App.
-
Palama v. Palama
338 So. 2d 776
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Cousin v. Cousin, La.App., (1976), , (1962).
- Cousin v. Cousin 327 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- Miller v. Miller 321 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
- Johnson v. Johnson 293 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
-
Adams v. Adams
243 So. 2d 318
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Insofar as past due installments are concerned, the judgment becomes the property of the wife; , (1962); Williams v. Williams, 211 La.
- Lakeside Rambler Sales, Inc. v. Durad Corp. 228 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
-
Viser v. Viser
186 So. 2d 661
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
(1962), and the decision in that case is controlling of this issue.
-
Davis v. Le Blanc
149 So. 2d 252
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Viser v. Viser, La., ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., 211 La.