Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company, 153 So. 2d 395.
- Sandra Mitchell Dietle v. James Vernon LaFleur and Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
-
Victor Bruno v. Brd US, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
995, (1971); So.2d 395 (1963); Weber, supra.
- Alice Mabel Crews v. Broussard Plumbing and Heating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Crews v. BROUSSARD PLUMBING AND HEATING 38 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Jackson v. Callaghan 24 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
- Benjamin v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 893 So. 2d 1 La. 2004
-
Riley v. Salley
874 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
-
Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc.
754 So. 2d 209
La. 1999
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328D (1965); W. Prosser & W. Keeton, The Law of Torts § 39 at 248 (5th ed.1984); , (1963); Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., supra .
-
Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co.
692 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
-
Pierce v. Milford
688 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
-
Pierce v. Milford
688 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
-
Ferruzzi, USA, Inc. v. RJ Tricon Co.
645 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
and restated by the Court in Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, 262 La.
-
Lasha v. Olin Corp.
625 So. 2d 1002
La. 1993
137 , (1964); , (1963); Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co., 243 La.
-
Leger v. Citron Ford, Inc.
589 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1963); emphasis in the original.
- Valiant Ins. Co. v. City of Lafayette 574 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR.
564 So. 2d 654
La. 1990
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328D (1965); W. Prosser & W. Keeton, The Law of Torts § 39, at 248 (5th ed. 1984); , (1963); Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., supra .
- Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc.
554 So. 2d 746
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
eses than the defendant’s tort with a “ ‘fair amount of certainty’ Whatever the descriptive term used, however, proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.’ Further, , (1963), by this burden of proof, the circumstantial evidence requisite in civil negligence cases need not negate all other possible causes of injury, as the op
-
Christensen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
552 So. 2d 1377
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
See Naquin v. Marquette Casualty *1379 Co., , (1963) (emphasis in the original).
-
Pace v. Loyal Order of Moose, Metairie Lodge 2195
538 So. 2d 299
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Whatever the descriptive term used, however, proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.” Further, , (1963), by this burden of proof, the circumstantial evidence requisite in civil negligence cases need not negate all other possible causes of injury, as the opinions of the previous courts seemed to hold.
-
Bowles v. Litton Industries, Inc.
518 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
See also W. Prosser, Torts, [3d ed.] § 41, p. 246; Carter v. City-Parish Government, etc., , (1963).
-
Price v. CORPUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
515 So. 2d 589
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
(1963); Harris Drilling Co. v. Delafield, 222 La.
- Jefferson v. Antee 502 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Bloxom v. Bloxom 494 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Norris v. Bell Helicopter Textron 495 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Thompson v. Tuggle
486 So. 2d 144
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., 244 La.569, (1963) .
-
Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc.
483 So. 2d 934
La. 1986
995 , (1971); Naquin v. *941 Marquette Casualty Company, , (1963); Weber, supra.
-
McCann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
483 So. 2d 205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
(1963); King v. King, 253 La.
- Bush v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 477 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- Rawls v. Morris 470 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Kincade v. Doll 472 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
Turner v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America
472 So. 2d 43
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
See also, W. Prosser, Torts [3d ed.]§ 41, p. 246; Carter v. City-Parish Government, etc., , (1963).
- Vollenweider v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 466 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- Lemon v. Fein 467 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
Agoff v. Town, Village or City of Jean Lafitte
464 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
stated that proof by a preponderance of evidence requires only that a litigant satisfy the court or jury by sufficient evidence that the existence of a fact is more probable or likely that its nonexistence.
- Sibley v. Gifford-Hill & Co. 456 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd. 452 So. 2d 162 La. 1984
- Jewell v. Thompson 445 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Davila v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 444 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
-
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. SHAMROCK CONST. CO., INC.
441 So. 2d 379
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
As appellant aptly notes, the test of sufficiency in a
-
National Roofing & Siding Co. v. Gros
433 So. 2d 403
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
(1963); A & M Pest Control Serv.
- Pawlak v. Brown 430 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
-
Reynaud v. Leonard
430 So. 2d 314
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Co., , (1963), it need only prove the causal relationship to be more probable than not.
-
Jones v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
430 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
A. & , , 397 as: "Taken as a whole, circumstantial evidence must exclude other reasonable hypothesis with a fair amount of certainty.
- Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC. 423 So. 2d 1080 La. 1982
- Baronet v. Mobil Chemical Corp. 422 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. of New York v. Holiday Rambler Corp. 420 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Palermo v. Allstate Ins. Co.
415 So. 2d 437
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1963): "Causation may, of course, be proved by circumstantial evidence.
- Green v. City of Alexandria 413 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Furtado v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 413 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982