DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kay v. Carter, 150 So. 2d 27.

185 citing documents.

  • St. Cyr v. Catherine's Stout Shoppe 505 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment since.
  • Stuart v. City of Morgan City 504 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. Leger 503 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1976); , (1963); (La.App.
  • University Prop. Corp. v. Fidelity Nat. Bank 500 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • La. Power & Light Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 493 So. 2d 1149 La. 1986
  • Buzbee v. Fidelity National Bank 492 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Ryder ex rel. Cupp v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Co. 495 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).”
  • Gilvin v. Arabi Cab Co. 483 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” The main point of argument is whether the alleged liability of Alphonso arose out of the use of the vehicle, more specifically, whether the act of waving his hand to signal Dawn Gilvin and her friend to cross the street, arose out of the use of the vehicle.
  • Hemphill v. State Farm Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment Since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Kinney v. Hutchinson 468 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Green v. DeFelice 466 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment Since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Ruschel v. Wesbak Park 466 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Heater v. Texas Gas & Exploration Corp. 466 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., , (1963); (La.App.
  • Rhines v. Carpenter 465 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    (1963); Ledbetter v. Myers, supra; Verrett v. Cameron Telephone Co., supra.
  • Toler v. Pacific Intern. Petroleum, Inc. 465 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Topole v. Eidson 464 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Pisarello v. Administrator's Service Corp. 464 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Holmes v. St. Charles General Hosp. 465 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Carroll v. Newtron, Inc. 477 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1976); , (1963); (La.App.
  • Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. M & a FARMS, LTD. 462 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Sosa v. Chandler Machine Co. 459 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Ralative to Summary Judgment since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Woodson Const. Co., Inc. v. RL Abshire Const. Co. 459 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Concrete Post-Tensioning v. Armco, Inc. 449 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir.1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment Since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Massingale v. Sibley 449 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Williams v. Airport Appliance & Floor Covering, Inc. 445 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Whitney v. Mallet 442 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., Kay v. Carter, 243 La.1095, (1963); (La.App.
  • Ledbetter v. Myers 438 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; , (1963).
  • Quintana Petroleum Corp. v. Alpha Investments Corp. 435 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection, Intracoastal Pipe Repair & Supply Co. 435 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Indus. Sand and Abrasives v. L. & NR Co. 427 So. 2d 1152 La. 1983
    1121 , (1972); cf. Albatross Shipping Corp. v. Stewart, 326 F.2d 208 (5th Cir. 1964); , (1963); Comment, Development of Jurisprudence in Louisiana Relative to Summary Judgment Since 1960, 12 Loyola L.Rev.
  • Ortego v. Ortego 425 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Inc., , (1963); (La.App.
  • McKenzie v. Standard Life Insurance Co. 422 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Doyen v. Cessna Aircraft Co. 416 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc. supra; , (1963)."
  • Verrett v. Cameron Telephone Co. 417 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Coop., Inc., , (1963); (La.App.
  • Home Insurance Co. v. Simon 411 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” The defendants in the present case argue that since The Home introduced no counter-affidavits or other evidence, there is no genuine issue as to material fact.
  • Gautreau v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Coop., Inc., , (1963); (La.App.
  • Barnes v. Combined Ins. Co. of America 409 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra, Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra, , (1963)."
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. Bollich 408 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Clement v. Taylor, supra; , (1963).
  • Reine v. Kearns 402 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” In the present case, because there existed a genuine issue as to material fact, i.e., whether the plaintiff’s heart attack was a direct and natural result of the compensa-ble primary injury, the granting of defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the trial court was improper.
  • Howard v. Callahan 396 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).
  • Savarese v. Bye 398 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    (1963); Accordingly, we find that the landowners owed a duty not to obstruct the vision of passing motorists; and that the landowners have not discharged th
  • Morrison v. Fineran 397 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    (1963); DeSalvo v. Doll, 209 La.
  • Parish Nat. Bank v. Lane 397 So. 2d 1282 La. 1981
  • Rennier v. Johnson 410 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Clement v. Taylor, supra; , (1963).
  • Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. 394 So. 2d 1189 La. 1981
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra ; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; , (1963).
  • Hobgood v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance 392 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” Under LSA-C.C.P.
  • Brinkley v. Murrell Enterprises, Inc. 389 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Clement v. Taylor 382 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Gamble v. Gamble 391 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” First we note that there does not seem to be any factual issue raised as to the indivisibility of the property such that it could be partitioned in kind or was subject to partition by licitation, and that portion of the judgment ordering a partition by licitation is justified.
  • Chaisson v. Domingue 372 So. 2d 1225 La. 1979
    Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra ; Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp., supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; , (1963).