Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kay v. Carter, 150 So. 2d 27.

185 citing documents.

Ray v. Associated Indem. Corp. 373 So. 2d 166 La. 1979
Co. v. City of Baton Rouge, supra; , (1963).
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 372 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra; , (1963).” By applying these principles and after reviewing the pleadings, affidavit and answers to interrogatories, and resolving all doubts against the mover (Portage), we are convinced that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff was orally authorized to continue acting as age
Bernard v. Vidrine 365 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(contributory negligence); , (1963).” The burden of proof rests on the mover for summary judgment; all doubts are resolved against him.
Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton Rouge 362 So. 2d 561 La. 1978
Andrew Development Corp. v. West Esplanade Corporation, supra ; Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; , (1963).
In the Matter of Vermilion Parish Sch. Bd. 357 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Langford Land Co. v. Dietzgen Corp. 352 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Craft v. Trahan 351 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
1 Cir. 1976); , (1963); (La.App.
Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp. 347 So. 2d 210 La. 1977
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc., supra ; , (1963).
Walker v. Graham 343 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(contributory negligence); , (1963).
Morgan v. Matlack, Inc. 342 So. 2d 167 La. 1977
Zadeck v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 338 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Vallery v. Olin Corp. 337 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc. 332 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc. 328 So. 2d 367 La. 1976
(contributory negligence); , (1963).
White v. Batson 317 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
`not all seeming defects render a title unmerchantable, especially those based on objections which are obviously groundless; it is when there are outstanding rights in third persons (not parties to the action) who might thereafter make claims of a substantial nature against the property, and hence
Ellerson v. Scott 320 So. 2d 527 La. 1975
966-68; , (1963); Roy & (La.App.
Fisher v. Cash Grocery and Sales 316 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Cates v. BEAUREGARD ELECETRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. 316 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
which holds that summary judgments should not be used as a substitute for trial on the merits, and that in case of doubt the motion for summary judgment should be denied, , (1963) and its progeny.
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
1039 , (1970) , (1963) have held that the decisions of federal courts interpreting federal statutes were highly persuasive in interpreting state statutes patterned after those federal statutes.
Scott v. Butler Bros. Furniture Co. of Baker, Inc. 315 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1963); Corceller v. Bonanza International, Inc., La.App., (4 Cir. 1974).
Vidrine v. White 309 So. 2d 679 La. 1975
Landry & Passman Rlty., Inc. v. BEADLE, S., W. & A., INC. 303 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Cousins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, La.App., .
Cadle v. McNemar Construction Co. 281 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
See: Kay v. Carter, et al., , ; Roy & Roy v. Riddle, La.App.
Bodcaw Company v. Enterkin 273 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Vaughn v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. of New York 263 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Simon v. Castille, La.App.
Vincent v. Gold 261 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Jurisprudence holds the burden is on the mover to show clearly there is no such factual issue, and any doubt must be resolved against the granting of a summary judgment, , (1963); (La.App.
Duplessis v. Hullinghorst 255 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Morgavi v. Mumme 254 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Domingue v. Independent, Inc. 248 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
See: Kay v. Carter, et al, , ; Roy & Roy v. Riddle, La.App.
Breaux v. Apache Oil Corporation 240 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Duhon v. Boustany 239 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Acadia Vermilion Rice Irrigating Company v. Broussard, La.App., .
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Morgan & Lindsey, Inc. 238 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
See: , ; Roy & Roy v. Riddle, La.App.
Jones v. Davis 233 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
-30 (1963), made these observations: "Those courts have laid down certain basic principles to be followed in connection with the use of Rule 56 to obtain summary judgments.
Yates v. M & N Constructors, Inc. 238 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Greene v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; and Allen v. United States Fire Insurance Company, et al., La.App., .
Chisholm v. Stevens 231 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
3 Cir., ; , ; Ellis v. Johnson Lumber Company, Inc., La.App.
Joubert v. Sylvester 230 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Rivette v. Moreau 225 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Fontenot v. Aetna Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
See: , ; Roy & Roy v. Riddle, La.App.3rd Cir., ; Green v. Southern Bell Tel.
Quina v. Orleans Parish School Board 224 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963); Grant v. Touro Infirmary, La.App., (1964); Cazalas, supra, Note 1, p. 131.
Foreman v. Maryland Casualty Co. 224 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1963), our State Supreme Court held that a summary judgment should only be granted if there is a showing by the mover that there is no genuine issue of fact, and the burden of proof is on the mover.
Meaux v. Hoffpauir 219 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
McLain v. Zurich Insurance 220 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Owens v. AAA Contracting Co. 219 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
See: , ; Ellis v. Johnson Lumber Company, La.App., ; Burrus v. Guest House of Opelousas, Inc., La.App., .
Joiner v. Lenee 213 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Greene v. Travelers Insurance Co. 212 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In the Smith case, supra, we observed that summary judgments are to be cautiously granted, , , the landmark case on the subject.
Young v. Stevens 209 So. 2d 25 La. 1968
(1963) ; DeSalvo v. Doll, 209 La.
Green v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 204 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Roy & Kay v. Carter, et al., , ; Barron & Holtzoff, Fed.
Coleman v. Temple Taxi Service, Inc. 205 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Landrum v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., and Cheramie v. La.
Pickney v. Sandoz 200 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
We are not unmindful that our Supreme Court is reluctant to grant a summary judgment, , .
Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal District v. Farquhar 196 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
4th Cir. 1964); , (1963); (La.App.