DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaspard v. LeMaire, 158 So. 2d 149.

655 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. Lanoix 847 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
  • Bodenheimer v. New Orleans Public Belt 845 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Tauzier v. Kraus 845 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general dama
  • Fremin v. Continental Ins. Co. 839 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc. 832 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Coleman v. Deno 832 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Ploger v. Reese 819 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Westmoreland v. Touro Infirmary Hospital 819 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See Abuan v. Smedvig Tankships, Ltd., 96-1013 (La.App.
  • Joseph v. Entergy 811 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • Harvey v. Cole 808 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damag
  • Dennis v. Turner 806 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    We also note that the 1962 Cassreino case, with its overemphasis on uniformity of awards, , (1963), and specifically overruled in Winfree v. Consolidated Underwriters, 246 La.
  • Clark v. Burchard 802 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Thornton v. National RR Passenger Corp. 802 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Davis v. Hoffman 800 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Daniels v. Burridge 785 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , (La.
  • Stokes v. Stewart 774 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Thibodeaux v. Bernard 772 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
  • McPherson v. LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 767 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Knepper v. Robin 745 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Guillot v. Valley Forge Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
  • Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 747 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Courteaux v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 745 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Gray Ins. Co. v. Hunter 752 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [3] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of *202 fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 740 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Lederer v. Famous Entertainment, Inc. 732 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • Lilley v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF STATE UNIV. 735 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Pryor v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 729 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    (1963), Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
  • Jackson v. Palmer 727 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Our initial inquiry is whether the award for the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the “much discretion”
  • Genusa v. Robert 720 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Washington v. Daste 749 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 716 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 713 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Allstate Insurance v. Reynolds 712 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate comb should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Sanders v. International Indem. Co. 708 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ...
  • Creel v. St. Charles Gaming Co., Inc. 707 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Riley v. Reliance Ins. Co. 703 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Baker v. Freeman 702 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Thomasie v. Lee 700 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    App. 2 Cir.1966); , (1963) ...
  • Viator v. Liverpool & London SS Protection and Indem. Ass'n 701 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Walker v. McCartney 700 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    App. 2 Cir.1966); , (1963) ...
  • Ruiz v. Oniate 697 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Futch v. Attwood 698 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Garza v. Fontenot 696 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Warner v. City of New Orleans 694 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Riser v. Acadiana Limousine Service 693 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Aupied v. Joudeh 694 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Mitchell v. Wall, 482 So.2d at 819 ; Umbehagen v. Liberty Mutual Ins.