DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaspard v. LeMaire, 158 So. 2d 149.

655 citing documents.

  • Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc. 692 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Idem.
  • Meche v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 692 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Broussard v. Romero 691 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Merritt v. Karcioglu 687 So. 2d 1002 La. 1997
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Baudoin v. Opie 685 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Stewart v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 686 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    Therein the court, after noting how difficult it was to express the proper standard of review, stated: Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Hebert v. Podiatry Ins. Co. of America 688 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Marceaux v. Gibbs 680 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Youn, , , (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • ESTE' v. State Farm Ins. Companies 676 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1963); Ballard v. National Idem.
  • Wartell v. Woman's & Children's Hosp. 676 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Youn, , , (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Roberts v. Lowry 673 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Callihan v. Town of Vinton 668 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Merritt v. Karcioglu 668 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Clement v. Frey 666 So. 2d 607 La. 1996
  • Sloan v. Dailey 664 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Lawrence v. Department of Transportation & Development 665 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
  • Oxley v. Sabine River Authority 663 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), thoroughly examined the standard for appellate review of general damage awards and stated as follows: , (La.
  • STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Dush v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Services 663 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion is vested in the trier of fact is ‘great,’ and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Claudet v. Weyrich 662 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Blair v. Imperial Inn, Inc. 662 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Akerman v. Dawes 658 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Williams v. City of Monroe 658 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damage
  • Schexneider v. Louisiana Dept. of Health and Hospitals 660 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Dauzat v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 657 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Edwards v. Pelican State Mutual Insurance Co. 657 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Black v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 657 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • In re Morales 652 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Broussard v. Fidelity Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 651 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present ease is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Phillips v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. 650 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Budd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Gaines v. Ryan's Family Steakhouse, Inc. 654 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    (1963); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Bradford v. Winn Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 648 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Detraz v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 647 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), the Supreme Court restated the standard for appellate review of general damage awards as follows: Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Davis v. STATE, DOTD 647 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), thoroughly examined the standard for appellate review of general damage awards and stated as follows: , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages....
  • Girvan v. New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc. 646 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Gygax v. Brugoto 646 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great,” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    959 , (1967); , (1963).” Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., -353 (La.1974).
  • Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Koepp v. Sea-Land Service, Inc. 645 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Broussard v. Meaux 649 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Fitch v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc. 652 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • McCann v. ABC Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages
  • Alonzo v. Silverman & Marks Plumbing Co. 640 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Nevertheless, , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great” and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
  • Thomas v. Champagne 638 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994