Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaspard v. LeMaire, 158 So. 2d 149.

655 citing documents.

Fahrig v. Pearson 288 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Art. 1934(3) ; , , and subsequent cases.
Thibeaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 285 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Thibodeaux v. Dixon 288 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
285 , (1971); , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
O'Keefe v. Warner 288 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
285 , (1971); , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity-Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Franklin v. Insurance Company of North America 284 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
Walker v. Champion 288 So. 2d 44 La. 1973
Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 288 So. 2d 42 La. 1973
Jenkins v. Dixie Rental Tools and Casing Crews, Inc. 283 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Squyres v. Phillips 285 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Bennett v. Leiva 284 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In Gaspard v. Lemaire (1963) , , where the owner was also a passenger, the court, in part, stated: “ * * * It is unrealistic to hold, in the present day uses of motor vehicles when heavy traffic is the rule and not the exception, that the occupant of a motor vehicle has factually any control or right of control over the driving of t
Guidroz v. Rojas 286 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
York v. Sedotal 281 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
(1963), which underlines the limitations imposed on appellate tribunals in reviewing quantum.
Tabor v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 281 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
963 , (1964); , (1963); (La.App.
Addison v. Travelers Insurance Company 281 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Art. 1934(3); , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
Barnett v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 286 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Freeman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 282 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company, 246 La.
Ardoin v. Bordelon 284 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Killian v. C & H Transportation Company, Inc. 283 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Although it may well be argued that the award to Mrs. Killian is somewhat modest for such an injury and recuperative period as endured by her, , (1963) and related cases.
Wright v. Romano 279 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1963); and Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
Young v. DeVillier 282 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
32:101 and 32:104; , (1963); and Leger v. Firemen’s Fund Insurance Company, (La.App.
Johnson v. Blanchard 283 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Zechenelly v. Employers Mutual Liability Assurance Corp. 280 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Co., La.App., (1970); Hyatt v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, La.App., (1969); , (1963).
Sacco v. Laviolette 280 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Art. 1934; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Dancer v. Department of Corrections 282 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
963 , (1964); , (1963); (La.App.
Simmons v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd. 282 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
Broussard v. Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. 277 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In examining the awards made by the jury, , (1963), and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Palmieri v. Frierson 275 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
285 , (1971); , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Tamplain v. Collinswood Poultry Co. 279 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
art. 1934(3), which states in part: “In the assessment of damages under this rule, as well as in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi contracts, much discretion must be left to the judge or jury * * , (1963) ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Eckel v. C. T. Patterson Co. 279 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
James v. Manuel 278 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1963), is not applicable since the only expert medical testimony is by deposition.
Boutte v. Hargrove 277 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Utilizing the available jurisprudence [*] for the purpose of determining the reasonableness of the damages awarded, , (1963), we find the quantum to be excessive and to constitute a manifest abuse of discretion by the jury.
Carpenter v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 278 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Brister v. Martinez 277 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
NOTES [1] , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Odom v. Sanders 277 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
[2] , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Dubois v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 276 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Just as we are admonished to refrain from drastic reductions in trial court awards [ , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company 276 So. 2d 309 La. 1973
(1963); White v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 222 La.
Brouillette v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 275 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
959 , (1967); , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Robinson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 274 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
3 Cir. 1963); , at 158 (1963).
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. 274 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
3 Cir. 1963); , at 158 (1963).
Williams v. State Farm Insurance Company 273 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Deshotel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 269 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company, 246 La.
Jennings v. Allstate Insurance Company 273 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
This is a venerable rule of law in Louisiana, , (1963)."
Cowart v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 273 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1963); Ballard v. National Indem *360 nity Company, 246 La.
Cline v. Ware 271 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
each award must stand on the facts of the case.
Theriot v. Transit Casualty Company 265 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Duplechin v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company 265 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
(1963), that unless there is a complete similarity between injuries in different cases, an award must be tested by "the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case under consideration."
Francis v. Lake Charles American Press 265 So. 2d 206 La. 1972
(1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Skains v. Allstate Insurance 264 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
*235 239 , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
Sukker v. Newsom 264 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Triche v. Williams 264 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by