Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co., 157 So. 2d 467.

19 citing documents.

  • William Boyd v. the Wackenhut Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    1 Cir.1962), judgment affirmed, So.2d 467 (1963).
  • Boyd v. Wackenhut Corp. 51 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1 Cir.1962), judgment affirmed, , (1963).
  • GOHRES v. Dryer 29 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1 Cir.1962), judgment affirmed by, , (1963).
  • Touchette v. Braud 382 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    So.2d 467 (1963); Johnson v. Wilson, 239 La.
  • Bamburg v. Nelson 313 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    (1963); Johnson v. Wilson, 239 La.
  • Adams v. Travelers Indemnity Company 277 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1963); Johnson v. Wilson, 239 La.
  • Nain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 241 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    The general rule of law applicable to a , (1963), wherein the court stated: “ * * * It is well settled that a motorist who attempts a left turn or who attempts to turn from a direct line on the public highways of the State must ascertain in advance that the turn can be made without endangering normal overtaking or oncoming traffic and the givi
  • Credeur v. American Employers Liability Insurance 220 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    wherein the court stated: “ * * * It is well settled that a motorist who attempts a left turn, or who attempts to turn from a direct line on the public highways of the State must ascertain in advance that the turn can be made without endangering normal overtaking or oncoming traffic and the giving of
  • Kuebler v. Mixon 218 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    McCann v. Mercer, La.App.
  • Hayes v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 213 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Flournoy v. Otero 212 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    239 , (1963); , *562 (1963); Johnson v. Wilson, 239 La.
  • LeDoux v. Montgomery 212 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Templet v. Walters 204 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Scott v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Freeman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; , ; Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Crow, La.App., .
  • Nugent v. Glover 205 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    More specifically, , , and followed in Clark v. Spillman, La.App., .
  • Merritt v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 199 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Therefore, we find no negligence on his part.” And, , (1963), our Supreme Court found that the passing motorist was free from negligence under facts and circumstances similar to those presented here.
  • Distinguished Hoover v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 185 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Counsel for the plaintiff has cited the cases of Hinton v. Beyl, La.App., , and Johnson v. Wilson, La.App., , while counsel for the defendant has cited Clark v. Spillman, La.App., ; Anderson v. Brackin Motors, Inc., La.App., ; Barras v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App., ; Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co., et al., , .
  • Fulgium v. Lamb 179 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Garris v. Jabbia 179 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    and cases there cited; Stephen v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
  • Clark v. Spillman 173 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    His failure to look the second time was a dereliction which had causal connection with the accident.” , wherein the Supreme Court in affirming a decision of this Court held as follows: “By his own statement it is clear that Mr. Smith was negligent in turning when he did for he did not look immediately before he started the turn.