Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sercovich, 165 So. 2d 301.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    32, (1972); So.2d 301 (1964); 2 Marr’s Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 664 (1923); 5 Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure, Section 2083 (Anderson ed., 1967); Annotation, 50 A.L.R.2d 766 (1968).
  • State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
    545 , 24 L.Ed.2d 504 (1970); , (1964); State v. Williamson, 145 La.
  • State v. Narcisse 512 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    820 , 59 L.Ed.2d 25 (1979); , 246 La.
  • State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
  • State v. Sayles 395 So. 2d 695 La. 1981
  • State v. Procell 365 So. 2d 484 La. 1978
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
  • State v. Hamilton 356 So. 2d 1360 La. 1978
    32 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 664 (1923); 5 Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure, Section 2083 (Anderson ed., 1967); Annotation, 50 A.L.R.2d 766 (1968).
  • State v. Hunter 343 So. 2d 143 La. 1977
  • State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
  • State v. West 319 So. 2d 901 La. 1975
    (1964), we stated the controlling law as follows: "Although it is generally considered to be erroneous for the prosecuting attorney to declare his individual opinion or belief that the accused is guilty when the accusation is made in such a manner that the jury may understand that the prosecutor's beli
  • State v. O'CONNER 320 So. 2d 188 La. 1975
  • State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
  • State v. Lepkowski 316 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
  • State v. Brown 313 So. 2d 581 La. 1975
  • State v. Kaufman 304 So. 2d 300 La. 1974
    32 , (1972); , (1964); 2 Marr's Criminal Jurisprudence of Louisiana, Section 664 (1923); 5 Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure, Section 2083 (Anderson ed., 1967); Annotation, 50 A.L.R.2d 766 (1968).
  • State v. Morgan 296 So. 2d 286 La. 1974
  • Criticized State v. Taylor 282 So. 2d 491 La. 1973
  • State v. Curry 263 So. 2d 36 La. 1972
    (1964), we set forth the-controlling law as follows: “Although it is generally considered to be erroneous for the prosecuting áttorney to declare his individual opinion' or belief that the accused is guilty when the accusation is made in such a manner that the jury may understand that the prosecutor’s
  • State v. Landry 262 So. 2d 360 La. 1972
    789 , ; , and cases cited therein; see also Article XVI, DR7-106, Articles of Incorporation, Louisiana .
  • State v. Cuchinelli 261 So. 2d 217 La. 1972
    (1964), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
    Art. 799, C. Cr.P.; , ; 50 C.J.S.
  • State v. Hudson 221 So. 2d 484 La. 1969
  • State v. Plaisance 210 So. 2d 323 La. 1968
  • State v. Wright 205 So. 2d 381 La. 1967