DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 169 So. 2d 64.

362 citing documents.

  • Lewis v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 230 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
    See Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Followed Sylvester v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 236 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    959 , at 132 (1967) ; , (1964); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Perniciaro v. Travelers Insurance Co. 227 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler Cadillac, 250 La.
  • Barlow v. City of New Orleans 228 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    959 , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Grauke v. Leger 227 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963) the court said “appellate courts should consider the amounts of awards in other cases only so far as they are relevant to the question of whether the judge or the jury abused its discretion * * The decision in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964) stresses the point that each case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.
  • Levier v. American Employers Insurance Co. 228 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Greene v. Allstate Insurance 228 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963); , (1964), and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • McGuire v. Oliver 227 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963), and in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebr., , (1964), and followed in subsequent cases, that the adequacy or inadequacy of an award should be determined by the facts and circumstances peculiar to the case under consideration ; and that the amounts of awards in “similar” cases are relevant only to determine whether there has been an abuse of discret
  • Brown v. City of Alexandria 226 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , , , , and its companion cases, that a type of injury has little significance for determining the amount of damages, but that each case must be evaluated according to its own peculiar facts and circumstances as to the damage caused by that type of injury.
  • Collier v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 225 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Arnold v. Patterson 224 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Latour v. New York Fidelity & Casualty Co. 223 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Chauvin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 223 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , .
  • De Battista v. Southern Pacific Co. 222 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Pelas v. Gulf Oil Corp. 222 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963) ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Ornaba, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Davis v. Pena 222 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    934 , (1965); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); and Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Gray v. Nathan 221 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    the Court said: "On appeal, if the appellate court affirms the lower court and quantum is the issue, the court should then review all the facts and circumstances on which the lower court bases the quantum of award, but this review is confined to determining where there has been an abuse of the `much d
  • Rowe v. Travelers Insurance Co. 221 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1964); and Winfree v. Consolidated Underwriters, Inc., 246 La.
  • West v. Continental Oil Co. 222 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Appellate review of the quantum of an award is limited to a consideration of whether the trial judge has abused his discretion, Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Hughes v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 221 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Ballaron v. Roth 221 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Haik v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 219 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , (1963) ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964); and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Harney v. Kountz 218 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Palmisano v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 217 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Booth v. Good Foods, Inc. 216 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).” In urging that the trial judge exceeded the discretion vested in him to determine the amount of damages due to plaintiff, appellant contends that the aggregate amount awarded to plaintiff for his many and varied injuries is out of line with awards made by appellate courts in cases involving sim
  • Trosclair v. Higgins 216 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); and Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Wilson v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance 213 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964).
  • Callais v. Furniture Showrooms, Inc. 213 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    239 , , , , to the effect that trial courts possess great discretion in awarding damages for personal injuries and such awards should not be disturbed on appeal except in instances disclosing an abuse of such discretion.
  • Hall v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 209 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity *171 Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Broussard v. Allstate Insurance Co. 208 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964); Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Viator v. Gilbert 206 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    Gaspard v. LeMaire, supra; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Caris v. Reeves 207 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    934 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Miller v. Badalamenti 207 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    934 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Montero v. Gaconi 207 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    934 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Daigle v. Guinchard 208 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    239 , (1963) , (1964), the “Doctrine of Uniformity” has been discarded in Louisiana.
  • Green v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, Inc. 206 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    959 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    In light of the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , at page 67 (1964), wherein the Court stated: "On appeal, if the appellate court affirms the lower court and quantum is the issue, *584 the court should then review all the facts and circumstances on which the lower court based the quantum of award, but this review is confined to determining whether th
  • Tri-City Finance Plan, Inc. v. Barbier 207 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    1934(3) and 2315, and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964).
  • Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    In light, of the Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , at page 67 (1964), wherein the Court stated: “On appeal, if the appellate court affirms the lower court and quantum is the issue, *584 the court should then review all the facts and circumstances on which the lower court based the quantum of award, but this review is confined to determining whether th
  • Danos v. Forsythe 205 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    [4] Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Tripoli v. Gurry 206 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .” Bearing this principle in mind we have given study to other cases solely for the purpose of determining whether the injuries in those other cases are similar.
  • Morgan v. Taxicab Bonding Ass'n 204 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 250 La.
  • Richardson v. DeVille 204 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964); and Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Guy v. Kroger Company 204 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Miller v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 204 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Edwards v. Butler 203 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964).
  • Martinez v. United States Fire Insurance 203 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , (1963); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Duhon v. Trinity Universal Insurance 203 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , (1963), and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964).
  • Allien v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 202 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.