DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 169 So. 2d 64.

362 citing documents.

  • Gernon v. Buchanan 201 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , , Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Manning v. Herrin Transportation Company 201 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    239 , , Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Dykes v. Champagne 200 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co. of Omaha, Neb., , (1964) in the judgment of the Trial Court is therefore affirmed, appellants to pay all costs of this appeal.
  • Ricardo v. American Indemnity Co. 201 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , , and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , 169 So.2d page 64.
  • Sittig v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 198 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    934 , , , , Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Desselle v. Wilson 200 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    934 , ; , ; Gaspard v. Lemaire, 245 La.
  • Sonnier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 200 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Olds v. Ashley 200 So. 2d 1 La. 1967
    Mindful of this Court's decision in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964) that awards in cases involving similar injuries are relevant only to determine whether the award is so excessive or inadequate as to constitute an abuse of discretion, we consider the following cases, all of which have been decided after Cassreino v. Brown (La.App.)
  • Olds v. Ashley 200 So. 2d 1 La. 1967
    Mindful of this Court’s decision in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964) that awards in cases involving similar injuries are relevant only to determine whether the award is so excessive or inadequate as to constitute an abuse of discretion, we consider the following cases, all of which have been decided after Cassreino v. Brown (La.App.)
  • Lomenick v. Schoeffler 200 So. 2d 127 La. 1967
    239 , , , , and its companion cases, 2 that a type of injury has little significance for determining the amount of *963 damages, but that each casé must be evaluated according to its own peculiar facts and circumstances as to the damage caused by that type of injury.
  • Couvillion v. Marquette Casualty Co. 200 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    However, we have followed the principle set forth in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964), and Gaspard v. Le-Maire, 245 La.
  • Reynolds v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 199 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , , the Louisiana Supreme Court in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , stated: “On appeal, if the appellate court affirms the lower court and quantum is the issue, the court should then review all the facts and circumstances on which the lower court based the quantum of award, but this review is confined to determining whether there has been an abuse of the ‘much dis
  • Followed French v. Ochsner Clinic 200 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Broussard v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 198 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    934 , ; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Jones v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 198 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , (1963), the Supreme Court gave further consideration to the abuse of discretion by a court or jury in assessing damages in the case of Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation 199 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 ], ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. [ ], .
  • Scully v. Louisiana Pine Products, Inc. 197 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , 169 So.
  • LaFleur v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lake Charles 195 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Article 1934(3); , .
  • Mouton v. Continental Insurance Co. 196 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , (1964).
  • Robert v. Travelers Indemnity Company 196 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Art. 1934 (3); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. (1964) , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire (1963) 245 La.
  • Collins v. Schulz 196 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., , (1964); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Clouatre v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company 193 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    239 , , Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , and Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Singleton v. Laudumiey 195 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , ; and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Barlow v. Plummer 195 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , 169 So.
  • Simpson v. Alexander 195 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Hernandez v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 195 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    LSA Civil Code Art. 1934(3); , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Barrere v. Commercial Union Insurance Group 195 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    239 , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
  • Morris v. Alfonso 195 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Article 1934(3), Ballard v. National Indemnity Company (1964) , , and Gaspard v. LeMaire (1963), 245 La.
  • Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    239 , ; and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Rhodus v. Allstate Insurance Company 192 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    239 , , and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Broadway v. Wester 193 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    LSA-Civil Code Article 1934; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Henderson v. American Indemnity Co. 194 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard et al. v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Fitzgerald v. Aetna Insurance 193 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard et al. v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Fruge v. Aetna Insurance 194 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , .
  • Hincks v. Edge 194 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., , (1964); Alexander v. Fidelity-Phoenix Ins.
  • McDaniel v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 194 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    After careful consideration we fail to find any basis for a conclusion that the award made by the trial judge constituted an abuse of his discretion in the assessment of damages; Ballard v. National Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska, , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Williams v. Bologna Brothers, Inc. 194 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    in support of this contention.
  • Dirksmeyer v. Hanlon 193 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    See McCorquodale v. Watson (La.App.1965) ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. (1964) , ; Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (La.App.1964) , and Gaspard v. LeMaire (1963) 245 La.
  • Smith v. Colligan 193 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Plaintiff urges this court that under the ruling of the court in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, (1964) , , the award of the trial court should not be disturbed unless it abused its discretion in assessing the damages.
  • Anslem v. Travelers Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    LSA-Civil Code Article 1934: , .
  • Vander v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 192 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    *642 963, ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Clark v. Keller 192 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Melancon v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 191 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    LSA-Civil Code Article 1934(3); , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Beavers v. Butler 188 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    239 , (1963), and Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , (1964), appellate courts may, and we may say it is their duty to, review all the facts and circumstances of the case, and particularly those upon which a trial court based its award, as well as the amounts awarded in similar cases, to determine whether there has been an abuse of the "much discretion" ve
  • Thibodeaux v. Reliance Insurance Co. 189 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Saxton v. Stewart 190 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Voelker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 190 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Mose v. Allstate Insurance 188 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    LSA Civil Code Art. 1934 (3); , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Bice v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance 188 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Although we feel that the award for Jere J. Bice of $7,300.00 was on the high side, we believe the ruling in the case of Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , is applicable.
  • Townzen v. Allstate Insurance Company 188 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    239 , , as clarified in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., , , we affirm the decision of the trial judge insofar as quantum is concerned.