Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCoy v. Pacific Coast Fire Insurance Co., 178 So. 2d 761.

20 citing documents.

Lee v. Lee 375 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Rayner v. Pharis & Pharis 363 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., La.App.
Wallace v. Pan American Fire & Cas. Co. 352 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Straley v. Calongne Drayage and Storage, Inc. 346 So. 2d 171 La. 1977
Leleux v. Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Company 318 So. 2d 15 La. 1975
General Leasing Co. v. Leda Towing Co. 290 So. 2d 334 La. 1974
General Leasing Company v. Leda Towing Co. Inc. 290 So. 2d 334 La. 1974
Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 282 So. 2d 474 La. 1973
Walker v. Jones 242 So. 2d 559 La. 1970
The Court reasoned that the judgment in favor of Walker on the main demand was a partial judgment, *562 and the trial court retained jurisdiction to adjudicate the remaining issues, citing Article 1915 , (1965), as authority for its position.
Walker v. Jones 230 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The question of the authority of the trial court to sign a , (1965).
Gauche v. Ford Motor Company 226 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Meaux v. Hoffpauir 219 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
See: , ; Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co., La.
McCoy v. Pacific Coast Fire Insurance 219 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The judgment against Pacific rendered necessary a determination of Pacific’s third party claim against Montaldo, and for the reasons assigned in its opinion on rehearing the Supreme Court remanded the case to the District Court “ * * * for the limited purpose of permitting the third party demand of Pacific against Montaldo to be proceeded with according to law * * ( , ) Following the hearing on remand the District Court rendered judgment on the third party demand in favor of Pacific against Mont
Barrois ex rel. Barrois v. Noto 217 So. 2d 414 La. 1969
(1965); Coleman v. Cousin, 128 La.
Fontenot v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company 209 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Ryman v. Bourg Truck Line, Inc. 196 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Burnett v. Marchand 186 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Bailey v. American Marine & General Insurance 185 So. 2d 214 La. 1966
r hand, claims the defendant cannot avail itself of the provi *103 sions of the statute to avoid liability as the facts complained of as constituting the alleged breach existing at the time of the loss were known to defendant’s agent (Montaldo Insurance Agency) prior thereto, citing as authority therefor a , .
Leonard v. Travelers Insurance Company 183 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
4 Cir., 1964) (reversed , ).
Bailey v. American Marine & General Insurance 178 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
We are cited by plaintiff’s counsel to the case of McCoy v. Pacific Coast Fire Insurance Company, La., , No. 47369 of the docket óf the Supreme Court, in which the opinion and decree (handed down January 18, 1965) is not yet reported.