Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Montgomery, 195 So. 2d 285.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Cartwright 252 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    Defense counsel cites State v. Montgomery , , (La.
  • State v. Ostrom 980 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    The next important case discussing the predicate offense in a , (1967).
  • State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    (1967), and State v. Washington, 248 La.
  • State v. Naquin 769 So. 2d 1170 La. 2000
    Although we have variously described the prior convictions used in recidivist DWI prosecutions as essential averments of the bill of information, , (1967), and as essential elements of the offense, in Carlos we recognized that the constitutional validity of prior DWI guilty pleas, as opposed to proof of the fact of conviction, is a "question of law for the Court to decide...."
  • State v. Carlos 738 So. 2d 556 La. 1999
    1977); and as essential averments that do not constitute a "material ingredient" of the crime, , (1967); State v. Washington, 248 La.
  • State v. Mobley 592 So. 2d 1282 La. 1992
    prosecution are considered essential elements of the offense, or essential averments of the bill of information, , (1967), the state bears the burden of establishing their constitutional validity, if they came by way of guilty pleas, and of proving the convictions at trial.
  • State v. Mobley 568 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    14:98(F) was enacted, , -288 (1967) discussed La.R.S.
  • State v. Pugh 536 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Franklin 461 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Forrest 439 So. 2d 404 La. 1983
    (1967); State v. Duncan, 219 La.
  • State v. Neal 347 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
  • State v. Ricks 329 So. 2d 684 La. 1976
  • State v. Bouzigard 286 So. 2d 633 La. 1973
  • Walker v. Allen 281 So. 2d 693 La. 1973
  • Smith v. Department of Public Safety 254 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    In the absence of such an allegation the indictment will not support a sentence as a second offender; , (1967).
  • State v. Bass 222 So. 2d 865 La. 1969
  • State v. Gerald 199 So. 2d 536 La. 1967
  • State v. Johnson 196 So. 2d 797 La. 1967
    This court, in the decision handed down on February 20, 1967 , , held that in order for an accused to be sentenced as a multiple offender it is necessary to allege the prior convictions in the accusation and further pointed out that “even though prior convictions do not constitute a material ingredient of the crime * * * charged, * * * that in order for the accuse