90-K-2463 Precedential Processed

State v. Mobley

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed January 31, 1992 · 592 So. 2d 1282

Cited by

State v. Collins 275 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Hoerner 88 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Ostrom 980 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Harris 754 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Carlos 738 So. 2d 556 La. 1999
State v. Davis 734 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Lecompte 734 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Anderson 720 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Middleton v. Parish of Jefferson 707 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc. 684 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Randolph 674 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Rolen 662 So. 2d 446 La. 1995

all 13 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Mobley 568 So. 2d 1368
State v. Krause 405 So. 2d 832
State v. Montgomery 250 La. 326
State v. Jones 404 So. 2d 1192
State v. Wiggins 399 So. 2d 206
State v. Husband 437 So. 2d 269
State v. Williams 366 So. 2d 1369
State v. Landry 588 So. 2d 345

Opinion text

592 So.2d 1282 (1992) STATE of Louisiana v. Kathleen MOBLEY. No. 90-K-2463. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 31, 1992. PER CURIAM. Granted. The defendant's conviction for third offense D.W.I., 568 So.2d 1368 , is reversed, judgment for second offense D.W.I. is entered, and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing. Whether the predicate convictions in a multiple offender D.W.I. prosecution are considered essential elements of the offense, State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981), or essential averments of the bill of information, State v. Montgomery, 250 La. 326 , 195 So.2d 285 (1967), the state bears the burden of establishing their constitutional validity, if they came by way of guilty pleas, and of proving the convictions at trial. State v. Jones, 404 So.2d 1192 (La.1981); State v. Wiggins, 399 So.2d 206 (La.1981). The state also bears the burden at trial of negating the cleansing period in La.R.S. 14:98(F). Cf. State v. Husband, 437 So.2d 269 (La.1983); State v. Williams, 366 So.2d 1369 (La.1978), modified on other grounds, State v. Landry, 588 So.2d 345 (La.1991), No. 90-K-0162. LEMMON, J., concurs.