DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 200 So. 2d 127.

303 citing documents.

  • Blair v. Imperial Inn, Inc. 662 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    (1967); Ballard v. National Indent.
  • Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    (1967); Ballard v. National Indem.
  • Dauzat v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 657 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • In re Morales 652 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    963 , (1964); , (1967)....
  • Gygax v. Brugoto 646 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    285 , (1971); , (1967); and Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Koepp v. Sea-Land Service, Inc. 645 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • McCann v. ABC Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Dupre v. Exxon Pipeline Co. 638 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Makin v. Continental Insurance Co. 638 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    963 , (1964); Lomenick v. Schoeffler , (1967).
  • Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Sandidge v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 626 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Feigler v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 626 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    963 , (1964); Lomenick v. Schoeffler , (1967).
  • Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. 623 So. 2d 1257 La. 1993
  • LaCombe v. Dr. Walter Olin Moss Reg. Hosp. 617 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Brumfield v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 616 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    959, (1967) (Italics ours): The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Brown v. Department of Transp. 604 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    (1967): `The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing (on the basis of prior awards) the trier of fact’s award) , (1967) (Italics ours): “The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Monceaux v. Jennings Rice Drier, Inc. 590 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Ducote v. State 583 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Nastasi v. Fejka 556 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): *1314 "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Clouatre v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 557 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Landy on Behalf of Landy v. Smith 542 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Thomas v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 477 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • Richardson v. Continental Ins. Co. 468 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "`The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Guillory v. Agee 465 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Art. 1999], we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing (on the *225 basis of prior awards) the trier of fact’s award) , (1967) (Italics ours):’ “ ‘The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Tate v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Art. 1999], we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing (on the basis of prior awards) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours):" "`The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Jackson v. Evans Cooperage Co. 459 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Arena v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 441 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Gibson v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 426 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • LeBlanc v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 420 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Owens v. Hartford Insurance Co. 420 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.
  • Horstmann v. Drake 420 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court (on the basis of prior awards) the trier of fact's award) , (1967): *476 "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Blanchard v. A-1 Bit and Tool Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing ( on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "`The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Wall v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 389 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    See Reck v. Stevens, La., ; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Reck v. Stevens 373 So. 2d 498 La. 1979
    art. 1934(3), we stated (after exhaustive review of the facts, and reversing the appellate court for disturbing (on the basis of prior awards ) the trier of fact's award) , (1967) (Italics ours): "The law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
  • Lanclos v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 366 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    963 , (1964); , (1967); and restated in a number of cases since, including these: Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Hill v. Benoit 358 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Billeaud v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    963 , (1964); , (1967); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Billeaud v. UNITED STATE FIDELITY & GUAR. CO. 349 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    963 , (1964); , (1967); Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Allen v. Toups 348 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Lomeníok v. Schoefñer, , , and the long line of cases which follows that -decision, including Canter v. Koehring Company, La., , and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., La., .
  • Gaudet v. Allstate Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    963 , (1964); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Schexnayder v. Carpenter 346 So. 2d 196 La. 1977
    285 , (1971); , (1967); Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
  • Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 341 So. 2d 332 La. 1977
    963 , (1964); , (1967); and restated in a number of cases since, including these: Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
  • Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co. 338 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Ardoin v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 333 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    239 , , Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Reed v. West Bros. of Eunice, L.A., Inc. 338 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 330 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976