Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lomenick v. Schoeffler, 200 So. 2d 127.

303 citing documents.

Overturf v. Bernard 331 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Art. 1934 (3) requires that in assessment of damages in cases of offenses and quasi offenses “much discretion must be left to the judge or jury.” , (1967), the Louisiana Supreme Court, in referring to Article 1934 (3), stated: “* * * This law is plain and means what it says, and it is the duty of all appellate courts to follow it.
Ashley v. Roberts 331 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Martin v. Roberts 331 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Hankton v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 343 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Robinson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., .
Wheat v. Seng 322 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
art. 1934(3); Thibodeaux v. Travelers Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Hall v. State Through Department of Highways, La.App., ; Desselle v. Wilson, La.App., ; , .
Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board 315 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
239 , (1963); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Burrows v. Louisiana State Department of Highways 319 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
963 , (1964); , (1967); Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Wyble v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 316 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Reggans v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 308 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Fowler v. Gulf Insurance Company 306 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
963 , (1964); , (1967), and Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
Johnson v. McKay 306 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(1967), an appellate court may not disturb the judge's assessment of damages unless it finds on review of the facts a clear abuse of discretion on his part.
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. 304 So. 2d 351 La. 1974
285 , (1971); Lomenick v. Schoeffler, *353 , (1967); and Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Miller v. Travelers Insurance Company 303 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); and Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
Wiley v. Travelers Insurance Company 300 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Smith v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. 299 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
285 , ; , ; Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Taylor v. Rome 303 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Alexander v. Mid-South Sweeping Service, Inc. 303 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Derrick v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 301 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1967) ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Gianakis v. Mayen 301 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Watts v. Town of Homer 301 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Dewese v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Claiborne v. Southern Farm Bureau Insurance 299 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. 294 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
South Texas Lloyds v. Guarantee Insurance Co. 299 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Doucet v. Werner 297 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 296 So. 2d 257 La. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Malone v. Yager 295 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. 294 So. 2d 803 La. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Martin v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 293 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National In *279 demnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Taft v. Gist 293 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); (La.App.
Boutte v. Hargrove 290 So. 2d 319 La. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); and Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Mercier v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Department of Sanitation 290 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
( , (1967); Ballanga v. Hymel, 247 La.
Redd v. Prevost 288 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
963 , (1964); , (1967); and Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Thibeaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 285 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
285 , ; , ; Gaspard v. LeMaire, 245 La.
Tripkovich v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 284 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
O'Keefe v. Warner 288 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Thibodeaux v. Dixon 288 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Walker v. Champion 288 So. 2d 44 La. 1973
See, , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 288 So. 2d 42 La. 1973
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Lawson ex rel. Lawson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lake Charles 287 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
1934(3); , (1967) and similar cases.
Bynog v. Allstate Insurance Co. 286 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
3rd Cir. 1971), , (1967).
Bourque v. Vallot 286 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
1934(3); , (1967); (La.App.
Jenkins v. Dixie Rental Tools and Casing Crews, Inc. 283 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The duties of the Court of Appeal in reviewing a , (1967), as follows: [3] We recognize that in cases of this type the Constitution makes it the duty of appellate courts to review both the law and the facts, but in their examination of the fact these courts must give effect to the basic law set out in Article 1934(3) of our Civil Code that in the asses
Campbell v. Mack 285 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
the Supreme Court said: “We recognize that in cases of this type the Constitution makes it the duty of appellate courts to review both the law and the facts, but in their examination of the fact these courts must give effect to the basic law set out in Article 1934(3) of our Civil Code that in the as
Squyres v. Phillips 285 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
285 , (1971); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Nebraska, 246 La.
Guidroz v. Rojas 286 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1973
York v. Sedotal 281 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
( , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Tabor v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 281 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
art. 1934(3); , (1967); Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., 246 La.
Addison v. Travelers Insurance Company 281 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
239 , ; , ; and Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 246 La.